Do you think Grokipedia has a real chance to succeed and surpass Wikipedia?
Elon Musk was extremely frustrated that Wikipedia couldn’t be manipulated, and he even offered $1 billion if they renamed it to “d*ckipedia.”
Since that didn’t work out, he’s now trying to build his own platform for gathering information – claiming that Wikipedia is “hopelessly biased,” and that left-leaning editors influence its content.
Do you think creating Grokipedia makes sense, especially considering how much Elon Musk seems to want control over information? What's your opinion on this?
I've heard that a lot of people turn to Grok for information, and I personally use Grok, but I don't really like the person behind it, who has quite strange opinions and a way of expressing himself.
606 views
Replies
Cal ID
It’s hard to see Grokipedia surpassing Wikipedia unless it nails trust and transparency. Most people want info that feels impartial, not just another platform tied to a single voice.
minimalist phone: creating folders
@sanskarix I dunno what to think about that Grok thing when Elon shares posts like these: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1981750756895023463 How reliable could it be?
Cal ID
@busmark_w_nika I think reliability is the biggest concern with Grok, and yes, Elon could tweet anything anytime 😭
minimalist phone: creating folders
@sanskarix I wrote about X something here too :D https://businessandmarketing.substack.com/p/2026-social-media-forecast
Cal ID
It was such a good read!
Your prediction was spot-on. They are pushing more NSFW content on X, which could slowly transition into more upfront marketing of their monetization model (similar to OF). Being in the startup space, we feel like X is growing, but from an outer POV, it's not. (at least not at the expected rate)
The great question is... what is the "freedom of speech/content" he's counter offering? Would it really be impartial...?
minimalist phone: creating folders
@giulia_borghi Elon proclaims we are media and free speech, but he will silence those who do not please him.
@busmark_w_nika so we have our answer about where exactly is “hopelessly biased" 😅
I know that Wikipedia has documented instances where pages about (especially) individuals or events have emphasized negative details—some accurate, others not—and when new developments provide a more positive perspective on those 'negative details', or that show the 'negative details' are false, and people have tried to add/update the page with those indisputable facts (e.g. as indisputable as actual court orders or court decisions), those editors have faced rejections or even bans on Wikipedia. So the negative views on the page remain, providing a distorted view on the person/situation.
Grokipedia could offer a different approach to address such issues. How good it will be, however, remains to be seen.
minimalist phone: creating folders
@john_wern Is Wikipedia really so negative? Like yeah, we had some "case" with moderators and they voted "vox populi" about removing stuff :D
@busmark_w_nika Oh, I didn't imply any specific case. I have just heard from time to another instances where this is the case, and in those instance nobody seemed to be permitted to change anything. I just tried to generalize for all cases I'd heard about.
For e.g. math or physics or similar, I've heard no such issue; only relating to people/events.
I just hope we get a truly democratized system: Nobody should be able to prevent anyone from editing.
I think so. I've heard Mr. Musk criticize Wikipedia's reliability or bias before. To be honest, I don't know much about Wikipedia and I rarely use it. But I still believe in Elon Musk and his track record. I believe he can do it.
minimalist phone: creating folders
@dic_223 I think that Albert Einstein said: If everyone tells you that you’re crazy just because you believe in your dreams, and they end up coming true, you are the one who was right. :)
Grokipedia feels like Elon’s way of building a truth layer he can control, but information ecosystems thrive on diversity, not centralisation.
Wikipedia’s strength is its transparency and collective checks, while Grok seems tied too closely to one person’s ideology !!
Still, competition in knowledge systems can spark innovation, as long as we stay vigilant about who writes the narrative..
minimalist phone: creating folders
@vu3ozm But some people still trust his cult. Do you think he will succeed at this?
WikiCrawl
minimalist phone: creating folders
@wikicrawl Do you mean WikiCrawl? :D
WikiCrawl
@busmark_w_nika yeah, I mean it's been dead in the water since AI but if theres any demand for fact checking wikipedia articles. could get into it.
I don’t think Grokipedia will surpass Wikipedia anytime soon. Wikipedia’s strength is its neutrality and community-driven moderation—it’s not perfect, but it’s trusted. Grokipedia might attract attention because of Musk, but building long-term credibility around knowledge takes years and a lot more than hype.