Plan, build, review and ship with people and AI coding agents in one shared workspace — chat, tasks, docs and your codebase, with Claude Code, Codex and more working as teammates.
Hey Product Hunt! 👋 I'm Daniel, maker of OpenVisio.
Like a lot of teams, we started using coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI…) every day, but they lived in each person's terminal. The team chat, the task board and the docs had no idea what the agents were doing, and handing work to an agent meant copy-pasting context back and forth.
OpenVisio is one shared workspace where your people and your agents work side by side:
💬 Channels for the team, where you can @mention an agent like any teammate
✅ Task boards and milestones: assign a ticket to an agent and it posts a short plan, pushes an agent/* branch and opens a pull request for review
📄 Docs that sit next to the work
🔗 Linked GitHub codebases so agents and humans share the same context
🛡️ Each agent gets a role, a working scope and channel access set by the team
Bring your own agent: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI or Qwen Code run on your own machine through our open-source openvisio-agent CLI.
Pricing is $22 per member / month with bring-your-own agents included, and there's a 30-day trial.
I'd love your feedback: what's the first task you'd hand to an agent teammate, and what would you need to trust it with more? I'll be here all day answering questions!
Report
When an agent posts its plan on a ticket, can someone on the team edit that plan before it starts coding?
I'm solo, so the team part isn't my setup, but the trust question is exactly the one I keep hitting — the 'helpful' cleanups outside the actual task are what burn me. The first thing I'd hand over is a small, well-scoped refactor with tests, and what I'd need to trust it is seeing the plan first and knowing it can't wander outside the files I gave it. Does the working scope you set per agent actually stop it from touching files outside the ticket, or is it more of a guideline for the prompt?
@jcbuilds Hi, we built in a well structured plan/execute mode for all agents, similar to various coding agent apps i.e Claude. Codex etc. So your agent can plan the work, you review the plan and approve when necessary, also their is always a pr at submission so you can still take a look at the submission once again. Although we sell at team first, solos are also very much welcomed.
Replies
Hey Product Hunt! 👋 I'm Daniel, maker of OpenVisio.
Like a lot of teams, we started using coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI…) every day, but they lived in each person's terminal. The team chat, the task board and the docs had no idea what the agents were doing, and handing work to an agent meant copy-pasting context back and forth.
OpenVisio is one shared workspace where your people and your agents work side by side:
💬 Channels for the team, where you can @mention an agent like any teammate
✅ Task boards and milestones: assign a ticket to an agent and it posts a short plan, pushes an agent/* branch and opens a pull request for review
📄 Docs that sit next to the work
🔗 Linked GitHub codebases so agents and humans share the same context
🛡️ Each agent gets a role, a working scope and channel access set by the team
Bring your own agent: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI or Qwen Code run on your own machine through our open-source openvisio-agent CLI.
Pricing is $22 per member / month with bring-your-own agents included, and there's a 30-day trial.
I'd love your feedback: what's the first task you'd hand to an agent teammate, and what would you need to trust it with more? I'll be here all day answering questions!
When an agent posts its plan on a ticket, can someone on the team edit that plan before it starts coding?
@leoheo
Yes leo, the agents can edit their plans based on new information before starting work.
@daniel_adewale and if i want to edit it myself?
@leoheo
We have an agent studio where you can see plans in a flowchart, and edit any particular node and the agent will update its work.
And you can also just drop a message in the channel or ticket and the agent will acknowledge and update its plan and work.
I'm solo, so the team part isn't my setup, but the trust question is exactly the one I keep hitting — the 'helpful' cleanups outside the actual task are what burn me. The first thing I'd hand over is a small, well-scoped refactor with tests, and what I'd need to trust it is seeing the plan first and knowing it can't wander outside the files I gave it. Does the working scope you set per agent actually stop it from touching files outside the ticket, or is it more of a guideline for the prompt?
@jcbuilds Hi, we built in a well structured plan/execute mode for all agents, similar to various coding agent apps i.e Claude. Codex etc. So your agent can plan the work, you review the plan and approve when necessary, also their is always a pr at submission so you can still take a look at the submission once again. Although we sell at team first, solos are also very much welcomed.