Why I actively refused to add AI to my Mac App (and why it's a feature). ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ›‘

byโ€ข
Image


Hey PH! ๐Ÿ‘‹

Lately, it feels like every single app update comes with a forced "AI-powered" feature. The other day, I saw an AI integration for a basic calculator app. Are we losing our minds? ๐Ÿ˜…

When I was building OptiClear (a Mac storage cleaner), I got a lot of "advice" from other makers: "You should add an AI smart-cleaner!" "Use an LLM to analyze the junk files!"

I explicitly said NO.

I wanted to build a "dumb" app. An app that just scans your hard drive, finds the large files, deletes the duplicates, and goes to sleep. Thatโ€™s it. No API calls to OpenAI, no background processing, no hallucinations about what files are "important."

I think there is a growing, silent majority of users experiencing "AI Fatigue." Sometimes, we don't want a smart assistant; we just want a reliable tool that does one specific job perfectly and quietly.

Is it just me, or is the "AI-washing" of simple utilities getting out of hand? Do you still prefer "dumb" but reliable tools for certain tasks? Letโ€™s vent! ๐Ÿ‘‡

74 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

If you want to see what a refreshingly 'silly' and fully functional Mac utility looks like, you can check out OptiClear here from the app store.

I truly believe that the future of desktop utilities will come back to basics. I'd love to hear whether you agree or disagree!