A matching bank balance can hide two missing rows — free exercise
I made a two-page row-check exercise and answer key for Statement Review. It uses six fictional transactions. A four-row candidate CSV omits a 20.00 charge and its 20.00 refund, yet both lists still finish at 1,780.65.
Try the interactive example or download the exercise, with no signup:
A balance match cannot prove every transaction is present. Check the original pages, row descriptions, dates and signs before importing.
If you have a current conversion task, first check for your bank's CSV or a working import in your existing software. The free browser-local trial is for supported selectable-text bank PDFs: one account, up to 10 MB / 20 pages, numeric or English-month dates and clear two-decimal amount columns. It has no OCR, scans, credit cards or bank connections.
The site now has optional three-question feedback. Was your actual CSV usable, and did you need the local files? Sample tests are labelled separately. Manual minutes and a reply email are optional; keep financial records on your device:
https://statement-review-trial-20261020.activesnow6.chatgpt.site/same-statement-check
By Jason Ji, with AI assistance. This exercise is fictional and is not customer-use or time-saving evidence.


Replies
Be the first to reply
Have a question or a thought to share? Add a comment above to start the conversation.