Vibecoding is fun until it’s time to git revert. How are you handling massive AI hallucinations?

Letting tools like @Cursor or @Claude Code refactor 15 files in 10 seconds is the ultimate vibe. But we’ve been running into a massive wall: Git text conflicts.

When an agent gets 99% of a huge refactor right, but completely hallucinates one core module, trying to use standard git revert is a nightmare. You hit an unresolvable wall of red and green because the agent shifted formatting everywhere.

Git was built for humans typing linearly, not AI generating thousands of lines at once. Are you all just manually fixing the broken functions, or reverting the entire PR and starting over? To solve this, we actually paused our main project to build a fix called @Aura (we just launched it today). It’s a local meta-layer over Git that tracks the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) logic instead of text lines. It lets you surgically rewind a single broken function without touching the 500 lines of perfectly good code the AI generated around it.

Curious if anyone else feels like standard text-diffs are breaking their velocity, and what your workflow looks like when an agent goes off the rails!