General
Share and discuss tech, products, business, startups, or product recommendations
Start new thread
Harris Mohammed

Voice is the new keyboard. But where’s the Ctrl+Z?

by•

We keep saying voice is the future of interfaces — but what’s the voice equivalent of undo? Tab-complete? Soft delete?

I’ve been nerding out on Voice-first UX lately. Not just commands, but command language. What’s the grammar of good voice control?

Would love to hear what others are exploring here.

102 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Chris Messina

There's no need for undo if you use AI rewriting, like AquaVoice or @TalkTastic ...

Maybe you can elaborate on what you're trying to solve for?

Harris Mohammed
@chrismessina yes you are absolutely right.. but I am trying to look at it from another perspective.. I could be complicating.. Introduction of shortcuts increased productivity using a keyboard.. same thing happened after gestures were introduced.. so rather than directly using voice commands.. I was curious to understand how other energy spikes or patterns in energy spikes can create an immersive experience, without breaking the flow state when someone is working with a voice led interface
Adi Singh

@chrismessina What are you launching soon?

Santosh Kumar

I had users say oops or “my bad” to my voice bot all the time so i just mapped those to undo. Felt way more human that way.

Adi Singh

Voice interfaces are indeed the future, but our industry's obsession with 'conversational UX' has created a false narrative.

The real challenge lies in designing robust undo/redo mechanisms and voice-based editing workflows, not just rehashing 'natural language processing' buzzwords."

Prithvi Damera

Great question. At Growstack, we’ve been experimenting with voice-powered automation, and the biggest challenge isn’t recognition — it’s control. Undo, revise, even context-switching are still clunky. Voice needs its own “Cmd+Z” grammar, or better yet, a natural fallback like “Wait, go back” that actually works. Curious to see how others are solving for reversibility in voice UX.

Dheeraj

Voice UX is such a cool frontier, I haven’t thought much about it before. Smoothing something like this out feels like the next big leap after touch. I'd definitely use smoothed out voice UXs.

Just thinking out loud here, what if “undo” could be implied through real-time context, kind of like how we pick up on intent in a normal conversation? I'm kind of speaking to how we don't try undoing things we say in conversation.