Over the last few months I ve been interviewing founders and marketers who are worried their brand is invisible inside AI tools, even though they ve invested heavily in content and SEO.
With CitedSpy, our goal is to track:
Where your brand is cited or recommended in AI answers.
The gaps vs. your closest competitors.
Concrete actions you can take to improve that visibility.
I d love to turn this into a mini AMA / feedback thread:
If you could ask one question about your brand s performance in AI search today, what would it be?
"Happy to share what we re learning from early experiments and research as replies if that s useful."
Swytchcode
Does the tool also recommends what we should do to get more recommendations for them?
@chilarai Yes, that's exactly the goal.
CitedSpy doesn't just tell you where you're being mentioned it also recommends what to improve. It identifies gaps in your AI visibility, highlights the sources and topics influencing AI responses, and suggests actionable steps to increase the likelihood of being cited more often across models like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity.
As we continue to improve the platform, these recommendations will become even more personalized and proactive based on your brand's AI visibility patterns.
Macaly
tracking brand mentions across ai answers is the new seo tbh 👀 do you do sentiment too?
@petrkovacik yes .... 100% it's basically GEO, the SEO of AI answers 👀 And yes, sentiment too.
We track every mention across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Copilot: whether you're named, how prominently, and whether the answer talks about you positively, neutrally or negatively. Positive mention vs a backhanded one are very different signals, so we score both. Happy to show you your own brand's numbers if you want to try it.
honestly the cross-platform tracking across all the major AI assistants in one dashboard is super clean, you know most tools only cover one or two and make you piece the rest together yourself
@enayaw9g Yes ... we are able to do it up cleanly and one of the focus of ours is a Great UX, simple and easy to adopt and take actions to grow.
Ran CitedSpy on a small site I work with and was surprised how clear the gap reports were, showing exactly which queries ChatGPT was ignoring us on compared to competitors.
@glsmkoparaxusi thanks ... we love such fast adopter, Thank you so much! That means a lot to us.
We'd love to hear more about your experience and learn what worked well (and what didn't). Your feedback can genuinely shape the product in these early days. We hope you'll join us as one of our founding customers! 🚀
A lot of people asked us:
"How does CitedSpy compare with other GEO tools?"
So instead of answering one by one, we built a dedicated Alternatives hub.
Compare CitedSpy with the leading AI visibility platforms, understand the differences, and choose what fits your needs whether it's us or someone else.
Explore here: https://www.citedspy.com/alternatives
How do you handle the randomness problem? Same question asked twice to ChatGPT can give different brand mentions. Are you running each prompt multiple times and averaging, or single run? That changes how much I can trust the numbers.
NINA
AI visibility is quickly becoming as important as traditional search visibility. I like that this focuses on measurement first, because it's hard to improve something you can't consistently track across different models and prompts.