Claude by Anthropic

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•676 reviews•

40K followers

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•676 reviews•

40K followers

Visit website

LLMs

•

AI Chatbots

We're an AI research company that builds reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. Our first product is Claude, an AI assistant for tasks at any scale.

Claude by Anthropic Reviews

The community submitted 676 reviews to tell us what they like about Claude by Anthropic, what Claude by Anthropic can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 676 reviews

Review Claude by Anthropic?

Reviews praise Claude for standout reasoning, long-context reliability, and precise tool use, with many citing superior coding help, nuanced writing, and a calmer, more “human” tone than peers. Founder feedback is emphatic: makers of

Warp

rely on it for long-context code understanding and coherent agent workflows; makers of

Netlify

endorse it broadly; and makers of

Wordware

highlight agentic strengths. Users note fast iteration, strong artifacts/code features, and trustworthy outputs. Common asks: higher message/context limits, better desktop app polish, and lower costs for heavy use.

+678

Summarized with AI

Pros

AI assistant (84)

code generation (59)

contextual understanding (37)

reasoning capabilities (37)

data analysis (20)

creative writing (19)

nuanced responses (18)

fast performance (13)

ethical AI (11)

natural language understanding (9)

Cons

message limits (11)

typography issues (8)

contextual understanding (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Claude by Anthropic

to build Basement Browser

•3 reviews

Claude handles complex, multi-step reasoning better than anything else we tested. For Baselings, our always-on AI agents, we needed a model that could hold page context, user context, and social context simultaneously without losing the thread. Claude was the only model that consistently nailed that. We use Claude heavily in development and it powers how we build and iterate on agent behavior.

Alternatives Considered

Report

3 views3d ago

used

Claude by Anthropic

to build Concipe instead of Gemini

•5 reviews

We needed an AI that could reliably extract structured insights from messy user feedback — interviews, support tickets, Notion docs. Claude's ability to follow complex instructions and return consistent JSON made it the clear choice over GPT-4 for our pipeline. The output quality on qualitative data analysis is noticeably better.

Alternatives Considered

Gemini

Report

2 views3d ago

used

Claude by Anthropic

to build Super

•8 reviews

Claude by Anthropic has been instrumental in building Super. The team chose Claude as the primary language model because of its superior reasoning capabilities and contextual understanding. Claude powers Super's core features including cross-platform search, source explanations, and document analysis with remarkable accuracy. The development team made specific prompt engineering improvements for Claude, including better system prompting and JSON handling to maximize its performance. Claude's ability to handle complex queries and provide chain-of-thought reasoning has enabled Super to deliver 8x more relevant results than regular AI search. We considered OpenAI or Gemini, but we use them as fallbacks.

What's great

AI assistant (84)data analysis (20)contextual understanding (37)reasoning capabilities (37)

Report

201 views10mo ago

•3 reviews

Claude by Anthropic has taken a major leap for quant data applications with its new built-in analysis tool, allowing users to write and execute JavaScript code directly within the Claude.ai interface. This enables real-time, precise, and reproducible data analysis—think of it as having a code sandbox for advanced number crunching, data cleaning, and iterative exploration, all powered by Claude’s state-of-the-art language and coding capabilities. Users can now upload CSVs, process raw datasets, run complex mathematical computations, and generate visualizations, making Claude a powerful companion for tasks ranging from financial modeling and sales analytics to engineering dashboards and product insights. The tool is accessible to all users in feature preview, democratizing advanced data workflows and moving Claude beyond abstract reasoning into the realm of concrete, actionable quant analysis.

What's great

AI assistant (84)code generation (59)data analysis (20)

Report

42 views11mo ago

•23 reviews

Claude is seriously impressive – it feels like chatting with a thoughtful, well-read friend who’s also a genius coder. It handles long documents like a champ (think 200K+ tokens), gives nuanced answers, and doesn’t just summarize – it actually understands. I’ve used it for writing, editing, research, and even debugging code, and it rarely misses. What I really love is how calm and conversational it feels – less robotic, more human. Sometimes it can get a bit wordy, but I’d rather have that than dry, one-liner replies. If you care about clarity, reasoning, and a solid mix of creativity and logic, Claude is easily one of the best out there.

What's great

AI assistant (84)code generation (59)long context windows (8)contextual understanding (37)creative writing (19)nuanced responses (18)

Report

36 views11mo ago

•9 reviews

Here's a strategic review of Claude 3 (latest version): Claude 3 stands out with its exceptional context handling and analytical capabilities. Having used it extensively, here's what matters: Key Strengths: Superior code understanding: Remarkably accurate for debugging and development assistance Data analysis prowess: Excels at complex visualization tasks and data-rich queries Contextual awareness: Maintains conversation flow and relevance throughout long exchanges Nuanced responses: Provides thoughtful, well-reasoned answers that demonstrate understanding Performance improvements: Enhanced reasoning capabilities over previous versions More accurate technical analysis Faster response times Better handling of complex, multi-step tasks Areas for consideration: Message limits on Pro tier could be more flexible Typography interface elements could be refined Currently using it for code review, data analysis, and technical documentation. The accuracy and depth of responses consistently exceed expectations. Notably efficient for developers and analysts who need precise, contextual assistance. Upvoted for pushing AI capabilities forward. 🚀

What's great

fast performance (13)data analysis (20)contextual understanding (37)nuanced responses (18)reasoning capabilities (37)

What needs improvement

typography issues (8)message limits (11)

Report

31 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

As a software developer, I've had the opportunity to work with various AI assistants, and I must say that Claude by Anthropic stands out from the crowd. While my opinion may be slightly biased due to my background, I believe Claude deserves a solid 4 out of 5 stars for its impressive capabilities. Claude outperforms other leading AI assistants like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Llama 3.1 in several key areas . Its human-like responses and exceptional coding capabilities are particularly noteworthy . The way Claude understands context and generates code is truly remarkable. However, there are a couple of areas where Claude could improve. The pricing of its API can be a limitation for developers who want to use it extensively for coding purposes . This may hinder its widespread adoption in the programming community. Additionally, while Claude's context window of 200k tokens is substantial, it's worth noting that Gemini can handle up to 2M tokens , which could be advantageous in certain scenarios. While there is room for improvement in terms of pricing and token capacity, its overall performance and ethical standards make it a strong contender in the market. I'm excited to see how Anthropic continues to enhance Claude's capabilities in the future.

What's great

code generation (59)ethical AI (11)contextual understanding (37)

What needs improvement

long context windows (1)

Report

37 views1yr ago

used

Claude by Anthropic

to build Noah AI

•3 reviews

Claude works well for generating structured UI layouts and components from natural language prompts. In Noah, it’s primarily used to turn user prompts into frontend interfaces for crypto applications. Its ability to handle longer prompts and produce clean, structured output made it a good fit for generating UI scaffolding reliably.

Alternatives Considered

Report

3d ago

used

Claude by Anthropic

to build Params Editor for Chromium Browsers

•3 reviews

Claude was the unsung hero behind much of Params Editor's core functionality. With its direct implementation style and practical approach to problem-solving, Claude handled the majority of feature development with remarkable efficiency. One of the most pleasant surprises came when Claude accidentally implemented hot reloading while setting up the development environment—a feature I hadn't even requested but that saved countless hours during development! When other AI assistance reached its limits, Claude consistently stepped in to maintain development momentum, demonstrating an impressive ability to understand the project's vision and translate it into functional code.

Report

100 views10mo ago

•2 reviews

I am using 3.7 strictly for coding, rarely something else. And it is by far superior to anything else I tried. For content writing, I still prefer GPT, but for coding, just wow! Great job! First time I tried claude 3.7, I asked him to create custom sortable lightweight JS for me, and it created a solution that I couldnt create in a week. Without my instructions, it worked with nested lists, grids, had smooth animations, and much more. Crazy.

What's great

code generation (59)

Report

19 views11mo ago

1 2 3

•••