Reviews praise Cursor’s fast, context-aware assistance, strong diff/review workflow, and smooth VS Code–style ergonomics that reduce context switching. Makers of

Product Hunt

highlight easy migration from VS Code extensions, effective Agent mode, and fair value, while noting overly verbose outputs, occasional slowness, frequent restarts, and the downsides of a dated VS Code fork. Makers of

Base44

say it pairs well with one‑command backends, and makers of

Vozo AI — Video localization

credit it for rapid prototyping. Users laud multi-file reasoning but want clearer pricing and better stability on large projects.

+768

Summarized with AI

Pros

seamless integration (16)

intelligent code suggestions (12)

context aware (11)

AI autocomplete (10)

code generation (10)

fast performance (9)

VS Code integration (7)

pair programming (6)

error detection (4)

real-time debugging (4)

Cons

subscription cost (4)

occasional crashes (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Selene by Atla

•3 reviews

Very neat experience! A lot of our engineering team likes it. Still has some way to improve but definitely the best I've seen in this category

Report

1yr ago

Quadratic

•1 review

My co-workers got me into trying Cursor. Usually stuff like this I'll try briefly, but it just never sticks. But Cursor’s ability to give me useful suggestions consistently is pretty amazing and keeps me coming back. Keep up the great work Cursor team!

Report

1yr ago

•2 reviews

Cursor is the first AI-integrated IDE I've used beyond AI auto-complete. Having the LLM chat agent embedded in the IDE is saving me a lot of time. I find it particularly helpful for providing a skeleton of code to edit or for diagnosing source of errors. It's also very helpful for explaining pre-existing code in languages or codebases you are less familiar with

Report

4 views1yr ago

Portia AI

•4 reviews

Quickly become invaluable to my development experience.

Report

1yr ago

Portia AI

•1 review

Cursor is amazing in helping me really with the codes/tests. Two main improvements: Clear difference between which/when is better to use Chat vs Composer features. Also, chat should help me really change options or at least tell me how to do this in UI.

Report

3 views1yr ago

•6 reviews

在idea中使用这个工具，可以直接给我生成代码，但是生成的代码不一定是正确的，还是会需要自己去查看检查代码的正确性以及是否符合当前的业绩

Report

1yr ago

NYX

•4 reviews

Cursor drastically reduces development time . Super useful

Report

1 view1yr ago

•1 review

Replaced VS Code for me. The default coding-assistant experience that I reach for atm

Report

1 view1yr ago

•1 review

maximum productivity 🚀🚀 Cursor has been a game-changer for my workflow. The AI-driven features have significantly reduced the time I spend on coding tasks, allowing me to focus on bigger-picture development. While there are still some improvements to be made, it’s an incredibly powerful tool for anyone looking to enhance their coding efficiency.

What's great

fast performance (9)code generation (10)

Report

1yr ago

•5 reviews

A fork of VS Code with deeply integrated AI features. More effective than anything I've tried so far, including GitHub Copilot and JetBrains AI. Coupled with Claude 3.5 Sonnet, it's like having a senior developer who knows pretty much everything, at your side at all times.

Report

6 views1yr ago

1 2 3 4

•••