highlight smooth migration from VS Code extensions, but note agent verbosity, Auto model stumbles on complex tasks, and frequent restarts. Founders of

Base44

say it pairs well with one‑command backend deployments, and makers of

Vozo AI — Video localization

credit faster prototyping. Users applaud multi‑model flexibility and terminal integration, while concerns include pricing opacity, occasional freezes/latency, and context precision on large projects. Overall sentiment: fast, capable, widely adopted.

+767

Summarized with AI

Pros

seamless integration (16)

intelligent code suggestions (12)

context aware (11)

AI autocomplete (10)

code generation (10)

fast performance (9)

VS Code integration (7)

pair programming (6)

error detection (4)

real-time debugging (4)

Cons

subscription cost (4)

occasional crashes (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Cursor

to build kuku

instead of Windsurf, Claude Code

•14 reviews

Cursor inspired how AI should work inside an editor. Kuku adopts a Cursor-style diff and review flow, so AI edits are transparent, reviewable, and never applied without user control.

Alternatives Considered

Windsurf

Claude Code

Report

2 views2mo ago

Warestack

•15 reviews

Its ability to understand context and provide relevant suggestions, particularly for complex codebases, really sets it apart. Whether you're working on small projects or large-scale applications, Cursor.ai can help boost productivity and reduce development time. Highly recommend giving it a try if you're looking to streamline your coding process!

Report

67 views1yr ago

•1 review

superior to vs code but uses more cpu and battery

Report

20 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

Cursor has absolutely changed the way I develop software. To be able to go from idea to running an application in hours or minutes is a game changer. Being able to integrate with several different models makes it easy to experiment. I do wish that they didn't force you to use their Pro service for the Composer experience, since it doesn't come with the same data governance guarantees as going direct to the model provider. But it's so good I can hardly complain...

Report

45 views1yr ago

•1 review

I've switched full-time from VSCode to Cursor for development. The LLM-powered completions are the best out there (and I've tried a lot of them!), and their UX doesn't break my coding flow. Only hiccup has been the extensions installation flow isn't as smooth, but that's to be expected by any VSCode fork.

Report

17 views1yr ago

•16 reviews

Cursor accelerates our coding process, offering an enhanced alternative to GitHub Copilot. It allows us to interact directly with our codebase, simplifying navigation and comprehension. Once you use it, there's no turning back.

Report

22 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

Cursor AI is a pretty darn impressive code editor that's built on top of VSCode. The fact that it's a fork of VSCode gives it some serious superpowers when it comes to AI-assisted coding. The deep integration and control over low-level details allow Cursor to do things that regular VSCode extensions just can't match . One of the standout features is the Ctrl+K (or Cmd+K on Mac) shortcut. It lets you edit code in place, understands the context of your file, and shows a handy diff view of the suggested changes. It's way more seamless than switching to a separate chat window . Cursor also plays nice with a bunch of AI models like GPT-4, Claude, and custom ones. You can even plug in your own API keys. Switching between models is a breeze with Ctrl+/ . The Copilot++ autocomplete is pretty smart too. It looks at your recent changes and surrounding code to give more accurate suggestions, can fix syntax errors, and even predict where you might want to edit next . Now, while Cursor is built on VSCode, that's also kind of its Achilles' heel. For certain programming languages, there are IDEs that are just way better suited. Like if you're doing Java development, something like JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA is going to be a better fit . But overall, Cursor is a solid 4 out of 5 stars in my book. The UI/UX is clean and the AI integration is top-notch . It's a great tool to have in your coding toolkit, especially if you're already a VSCode fan. Just keep in mind that for some specific language needs, a more specialized IDE might serve you better.

Report

33 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

Fairly solid, shame it doesn't have mindfulness of the project across the ai debug/fix chats.

Report

19 views1yr ago

Cove

•5 reviews

I think we are due for a wholesale rethinking of what an IDE looks like with AI at is core. But while I'm waiting for that, Cursor + Claude is still pretty great. It's increased my productivity a lot and is definitely a step forward from VSCode + Copilot

Report

84 views1yr ago

•5 reviews

A fork of VS Code with deeply integrated AI features. More effective than anything I've tried so far, including GitHub Copilot and JetBrains AI. Coupled with Claude 3.5 Sonnet, it's like having a senior developer who knows pretty much everything, at your side at all times.

Report

6 views1yr ago

1 2 3

•••