credit the managed workflow, EAS Build, and OTA updates for cutting deployment friction. Users applaud the improved developer experience, easy debugging, and flexibility without lock-in, while noting occasional npm compatibility caveats and that deeper native needs may still favor the bare/CLI route.

+92

Summarized with AI

Pros

cross-platform development (9)

fast development (9)

react native integration (7)

EAS build system (3)

easy setup (3)

excellent documentation (2)

hot reloading (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Expo

to build Runo 2.0

•5 reviews

Expo's managed workflow let us ship to both iOS and Android from a single codebase. EAS Build and OTA updates make the deployment process incredibly smooth.

Alternatives Considered

Report

2mo ago

used

Expo

to build Good Assistant

•4 reviews

Expo is a fantastic solution to creating an app with native components, and smoothing out the many hurdles of native development. Great experience, and much improved over the years.

Alternatives Considered

Report

1 view1mo ago

used

Expo

to build Enough Cream instead of Flutter

•4 reviews

Expo's got hosted infrastructure, generous free tier, paved path for automation.

Alternatives Considered

Flutter

Report

1mo ago

•3 reviews

It streamlines development, but still, you need to be cautious about npm package compatibilities. Sometimes it's a more robust approach to go with React Native CLI, than Expo CLI.

What needs improvement

dependency issues (1)

Report

8 views3yr ago

used

Expo

to build SoloGuard

•12 reviews

I used Expo to build the app.

Alternatives Considered

Report

25d ago

•••

8 9 10