The modern developer s identity is scattered across the web, hidden in fragments that never tell the whole story. LinkedIn reduces you to a job title and a list of corporate buzzwords. GitHub shows your code, but not the late nights, the pivots, or the creative leaps that made it matter. Twitter/X captures your hot takes, but not your process. The result? Builders are invisible treated as interchangeable units of output, not as architects of ideas.
LinkedIn: The Corporate Mask
LinkedIn is a performance for HR, not for builders. It s where you go to look professional, which too often means boring. Your profile lists your tenure, not your talent; your title, not your journey. It s a platform that rewards compliance, not creativity.
GitHub: The Code Graveyard
GitHub is the gold standard for technical proof, but it s a ledger, not a story. You can see the final commit, but not the three nights spent wrestling with a race condition, the architectural pivots, or the aha! moments that shaped the product. GitHub shows what you built, not why it matters.
The Streak Obsession
Platforms like LeetCode and 100 Days of Code have turned engineering into a gamified sport. A 300-day streak proves discipline, not impact. It doesn t show if you can ship a feature users love, debug a production outage, or empathize with your audience. We ve replaced Proof of Build with Proof of Activity.
nice idea honestly. having one place where your actual work speaks for you makes a lot of sense, especially for indie hackers and devs who are spread across too many platforms.
curious, what do people connect first most of the time, github or something else?
I've sent people to my Twitter, my GitHub, my Notion and still felt like my work wasn't landing right. A dedicated place where builders show proof of work instead of just talking about it is something I didn't know I needed until right now.
Forg
@harshamv Glad you found it useful