Launching today
GStack
Use Garry Tan's exact Claude Code setup
348 followers
Use Garry Tan's exact Claude Code setup
348 followers
gstack turns Claude Code from one generic assistant into a team of specialists you can summon on demand. Six opinionated workflow skills for Claude Code. Plan review, code review, one-command shipping, browser automation, and engineering retrospectives — all as slash commands.
Snippets AI
Splitting Claude Code into role-specific slash commands like plan review, code review, and shipping is a practical pattern — it enforces structure that most developers skip when using a single generic agent. How opinionated are the workflow skills under the hood — are they rigid step-by-step procedures, or do they adapt based on the codebase context and project size?
Love seeing developer environment setups shared like this.
Is this mainly optimized for Claude Code workflows or does it also work well with Cursor / other AI coding tools?
the slash command approach is really smart. I've been using Claude Code for a while and the biggest friction is always starting from scratch with context every time. having pre-built workflows for common tasks like code review and shipping saves so much time. curious if you're planning to add custom skill creation so teams can build their own workflows too?
I've been using Claude Code for months and my setup is held together with scattered markdown files and random CLAUDE.md instructions. The idea of a curated, tested configuration from someone who actually pushes it hard is appealing. My main question: how opinionated is this? Half the value of Claude Code is customizing it to your specific codebase. If this overwrites my existing CLAUDE.md and memory files, that's a dealbreaker. Does it layer on top of existing config or replace it?
Really impressed by the slash command architecture. Treating these as specialized teammates you can summon instantly is exactly right. The separation of plan review from code review catches problems early. How do you handle priority when multiple skills could apply?
The role specialization concept makes a lot of sense - having Claude switch between 'plan reviewer' and 'code reviewer' modes enforces the mental discipline most developers skip when using generic assistants. What's interesting is how this mirrors how effective engineering teams actually work: distinct review stages with different objectives.
Do the slash commands maintain any state between invocations? For instance, does /code-review remember issues flagged in a prior /plan-review session on the same feature?
The specialized roles approach makes sense - a generic agent trying to do plan review and code review simultaneously often gets pulled in too many directions. Separating these into opinionated specialists with slash commands gives you predictable behavior without losing flexibility. The sub-200ms Chromium daemon for browser automation is a nice touch - most solutions add significant latency here. Does the engineering retrospective skill integrate with version control to automatically surface what changed between sessions?