highlight rapid iteration, smooth handoff to GitHub/Supabase, and turning vague ideas into concrete prototypes; one suggests pre-offsite sessions built around Lovable-generated prototypes. Praise centers on clean components, simple workflow, and strong frontend velocity. Critiques recur: loops on fixes, regressions on complex pages, limited daily prompts, steep pricing for small teams, backend/auth gaps, and inconsistent support. Overall: powerful for MVPs; complexities require patience.

+163

Summarized with AI

Pros

fast prototyping (30)

no code (14)

rapid application development (14)

design capabilities (9)

MVP builder (9)

GitHub integration (6)

user-friendly interface (6)

frontend development (5)

Supabase integration (4)

excellent prompt understanding (2)

Cons

buggy (12)

complexity handling issues (12)

expensive (5)

poor customer support (5)

limited prompts (4)

limited backend support (3)

limited error handling (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Lovable

to build Renamify

•4 reviews

Unlike most code editors, GPT engineer provides no reading or writing of code what-so-ever.

What's great

no code (14)

Report

3 views1yr ago

used

Lovable

to build ElectMap USA

•7 reviews

Lovable's AI engineer did a lot of the heavy lifting here and helped me make this app in record time. Integration with Supabase is built-in, and it is very simple to connect real data and give it a visual appearance. I considered v0 and Bolt.new, but this route was much faster given the full-stack integration capabilities and simple integrations

Report

8 views1yr ago

used

Lovable

to build swiftnotes.ai

•2 reviews

I used Lovable to get the initial FE boilerplate up. I had a better overall experience using this vs other tools like v0 / bolt because it just worked and it was fast.