Shadow

AI that sees, listens, and understands every meeting

4.9•23 reviews•

1.4K followers

AI that sees, listens, and understands every meeting

4.9•23 reviews•

1.4K followers

•

•

Half of every meeting happens on screen, but most AI tools miss it completely. Shadow captures both: what was said and what was shown. Every word, every slide, every screen—all without a bot joining your meeting. Shadow transforms that full context into real action. Write follow-up emails, extract action items, or create your own custom AI tasks. Never recap. Just move forward.

Shadow Reviews

The community submitted 23 reviews to tell us what they like about Shadow, what Shadow can do better, and more.

4.9

Based on 23 reviews

Review Shadow?

Shadow is praised for its seamless integration into meetings without the need for intrusive bots, making it a favorite among users who value privacy and efficiency. Many users appreciate its ability to transcribe, summarize, and automate follow-ups, enhancing productivity. The product is noted for its intuitive design and continuous feature updates, with a responsive team behind it. While some users express a desire for Windows support, the overall feedback highlights Shadow's effectiveness in transforming meetings into actionable insights, making it a highly recommended tool for professionals.

+20

Summarized with AI

Pros

bot-free operation (13)

meeting summarization (12)

non-invasive operation (11)

meeting transcription (10)

accurate note-taking (6)

responsive support team (5)

task automation (5)

post-meeting task management (4)

customizable prompts (3)

system-wide sound recording (3)

Cons

cross-platform compatibility (4)

speaker attribution (4)

early stage development (3)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•1 review

What's great

meeting transcription (10)meeting summarization (12)non-invasive operation (11)bot-free operation (13)

I've been using Shadow from the very beginning while in Beta test and I've seen this product improving a lot. What I love the most about Shadow is the non-invasiveness as only you will know it's listening, the accuracy in transcripting and the auto-start on a new meeting. In my opinion it's also fairly priced!

What needs improvement

cross-platform compatibility (4)speaker attribution (4)

I'm looking forwards to better integrations with other tools like NotebookLM or for the ability to chat about all the meetings at once rather than per-meeting 🙌🏼
Since it's integrated with Google Calendar now, it would also be great to have attribution to the speaker somehow.
Speech recognition is still sometimes somehow inaccurate.

vs Alternatives

Otter

Because of the non-intrusiveness, low price and automatically starting when I begin a meeting.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

22 views3mo ago

•1 review

It's clearly at a very early stage, but the Bot less nature is very attractive for note-taking in all environments without the impost of an agent video recording each meeting. Of course that also allows it's use in face-to-face meetings as well. I'm curious to see the product develop and how they overcome some of the downsides of a bot-less solution such as speaker names etc.

What's great

bot-free operation (13)

What needs improvement

early stage development (3)

Report

30 views1yr ago

•2 reviews

What's great

meeting transcription (10)meeting summarization (12)non-invasive operation (11)

I really like how reliably it automatically starts at the beginning of a meeting and captures the transcripts for me to refer to later. I can forget about it and stay focused in the meeting without weirding-out the others on the call with a robot "listening in" and trust it to know what we discussed, summarize action items, etc. that I can refer back to later.

What needs improvement

cross-platform compatibility (4)speaker attribution (4)

Would love to have this same capability on mobile but I understand that's a big challenge with the way permissions are different on mobile. I think there's a path to feasibility on Android at least and I would love to have it available there.