They recently added new integrations, shipped MCP support, launched a Nano Banana Pro Playground, released Opus 4.5 preview, expanded their Ambassador Program, and more.
credit it with building their entire frontend. Users echo rapid prototyping, polished React/Tailwind code, and strong design sense. Common caveats: struggles with multi-step flows, state/data wiring, occasional misses and regressions, and pricing concerns. Best as a UI starter and companion.
We're a two-person team where both founders write code, but our time is almost entirely absorbed by the core product... The iOS app, the agent engine, the API. The marketing site couldn't become a weeks-long project.
v0 let us go from "we need a site" to basementbrowser.com in a fraction of the time it would've taken to build from scratch. We'd describe a section, add an in-house design as visual reference/guide, iterate on the output, and it consistently produced clean, production-ready React/Tailwind that we could actually work with not slop we'd have to rewrite (it's actually in our monorepo too π)
The output drops into our Next.js monorepo without a fight. For founders who know how to code but can't afford to spend 3 days pixel-pushing a hero section, it's the right tool. We shipped a site we're genuinely proud of and moved on. Check it out at basementbrowser.com
One of two options I use for frontend design and sites that don't require much backend. Can't wait for them to connect Convex then v0 will solidify my first stop.
I still use Lovable sometimes and probably more since they connected Supabase, this just make setting up my database way too easy. That's the feature that keeps me split.
Vercel v0 is great for spinning up clean Tailwind/Next.js UI scaffolds from a prompt or screenshot. You get fast iterations and decent component structure. Where it struggles is multi-step flows, state management, data wiring, and design fidelity. It often misses requirements, so you still refactor and rewrite. The latest model pricing feels steep given the miss rate and retries, which makes ROI shaky for daily use. Compared to general coding tools like Cursor or Claude Code, v0 shines mainly as a design-to-UI starter, not an end-to-end builder. Wish list: lower-cost tier for heavy iteration, better memory of prior feedback, spec-aware generation, and fewer regressions between runs. Verdict: useful for quick UI drafts; hard to justify at current price-to-accuracy.
What's great
prototyping (8)clean code output (3)fast UI generation (4)React and Tailwind support (3)AI-powered UI generation (3)