Aevris' profile on Product Hunt

About

AEVRIS protects both sides of your LLM — before and after generation. Most platforms only scan inputs. AEVRIS also verifies your LLM's response wasn't compromised — the only commercial product that does this. Five agents run in parallel on every prompt: 🔴 Injection · 🟠 Social Eng. · 🟡 Exfil · 🔵 Malcode · 🟣 Alignment Three industry firsts: ⚡ Output Alignment Verification — detects successful jailbreaks in LLM responses ⚡ AGI Alignment Guard — runtime behavioral monitoring ⚡ MCP Tool Inspection — detects tool poisoning before it enters your agent context Vendor-neutral. Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, or any LLM. 5-minute setup. 🔑 aevris.ai/?go

Links

Twitter

Badges

Tastemaker

Gone streaking

Forums

p/aevris

•

7h ago

Why I built AEVRIS — the problem I kept running into

Every AI company I looked at was focused on making LLMs more capable. Almost nobody was focused on making them secure in production.

The more I dug into it, the more obvious the gap became. Input scanning existed but if an attack got through, there was nothing on the other side. No output verification. No behavioral monitoring. No way to know if your LLM had been compromised until a user caught it.

I kept asking: who is watching what the LLM sends back? Who is worried about adversarial AI? The answer was nobody.

p/aevris

•

7h ago

Unpopular opinion: input-only AI security is security theater

Every major AI security product scans inputs. Lakera, PromptArmor, Rebuff all inputs. None of them scan what the LLM sends back.

That means if a jailbreak gets through and some always do there is zero detection at the response layer. The attack succeeded. The compromised output is already on its way to your user. Your security dashboard still shows green. That's not security. That's the illusion of security.

Output alignment verification is the layer that actually closes this. It's what AEVRIS does and why we call it the first commercial product to protect both sides of your LLM. Launching tomorrow. Curious what others think am I wrong? Is input-only scanning enough?

p/aevris

•

7h ago

The AI security gap nobody is talking about

Every AI security product on the market scans inputs. Nobody scans outputs. Here's why that matters: if a jailbreak succeeds and your LLM starts behaving badly, every existing security tool has already failed. The compromised response still reaches your user. You find out when someone screenshots it. Output alignment verification is the missing layer.

That's what AEVRIS does and it's the first commercial product to do it.