Amarnath Kumar

We realized our support team was ignoring our official documentation because half the articles covered old features or outdated UI. Answering tickets took longer because people had to double-check everything verbally.

We spent time cutting our docs down to just the core essentials and archiving the rest. Trimming the clutter reduced our ticket response time by nearly 40%.

Do you have a scheduled routine for retiring old support docs, or do you just wait until the clutter becomes overwhelming?

I was reading about a developer whose 10-agent setup started acting up over the past few weeks. The more freedom they got the worse the output became adding bloat and getting trapped fixing low priority issues no one asked for.

I ve noticed a similar wall when letting AI handle full features solo. It often prioritizes tiny edge cases over keeping the core codebase clean.

For those running agentic workflows, what guardrails do you use to force them back on track?

A few of you installed him on launch day and never touched him since. That's the point, but he's changed since then. Right click the plant, "Update", done.

What's new:

• He updates himself now.

• You can offer him to someone, with a note inside. Right click, "Offer a cutting". They get a link, the note opens when their plant sprouts.

• Fixed: when the plant ends up off screen, he comes back to the middle.

• Fixed: you can now park the plant against the edge, or slightly off screen, so he takes less room. The bubble follows him.

  If yours already says 0.2.15, you're good. Go pick who gets the first cutting.