Artem Kosilov

Cross-border VAT makes sense. What I’m more curious about is the stretch where inventory already moved, but the cash side still hasn’t fully caught up. Returns, delayed refunds, partial settlements. How does CONA handle that in-between state before final reconciliation?

most of the time it’s not really about features for us it’s more about when the product starts doing real work for someone we’ve seen people use “paid” features casually and still churn, and others stick around just because one small thing saves them time every day so the line ends up being closer to “does this replace effort or responsibility” rather than how complex the feature is gets messy...

The ecommerce angle makes sense. Getting to a storefront is not the hard part anymore. The real test is whether the system keeps the work moving without creating more cleanup for the founder. How much are your ecommerce users letting Denovo run on its own?

getting a campaign live fast is one thing, but what happens once real results start coming in? does Pixero actually change the creative and audience setup based on that, or is the main value more in launch and day-to-day upkeep?

the board and sandbox together make sense, but after a few iterations things usually start drifting a bit, do people keep updating the board or does it get ignored over time?

the versioned workflow part is interesting once agents start registering more of their own flows back into the system, how do you stop the catalog from turning into a pile of almost-duplicate specs over time?

the reusable skills part is what caught my eye here feels like that’s where this either becomes genuinely useful or just another assistant people try a few times how are teams deciding which workflows are worth turning into skills vs just using ad hoc?

feels like the hard part here is not building the hub, but giving people a reason to come back to it how are you thinking about that?

wechat is such a different environment compared to web apps feels like user expectations there are very specific do people actually engage with bots like this naturally, or does it still feel a bit off?

the specialist setup is interesting feels like the hard part is not the agents themselves, but how they coordinate once tasks start overlapping how do you handle conflicts between them?

makes sense. feels like there’s a tradeoff though, big tools bring traffic but also a lot more competition. wonder if smaller products end up giving better visibility in the long run

not sure this is really about access. most teams already have some kind of research lying around just doesn’t get used that much in day to day decisions. wonder if putting it closer to the workflow actually changes that

idea makes sense, but discussions around agents change really fast. how do you keep content relevant over time?

Interesting take on rebuilding the ATS around semantic search instead of a relational model. How does that change the way recruiters actually navigate candidate data day to day?

How are developers using Astrio today? Mostly for experiments or already in production projects?

The browser-agent space is getting crowded fast. What kinds of tasks does Clawther handle best today?