Bradley Simon

I ve bounced between the two a few times and keep changing my mind. One feels nicer for certain things, then I ll go back to the other because I miss some small feature.

I m less interested in which one looks cooler and more interested in which one you still enjoy using after the initial excitement wears off.

If you ve properly used both, which one won you over?

While designing approval flows for AI agents, I ve started questioning static permissions.

A better model might be:

• New agent: approval required

• Proven on low-risk actions: more autonomy

• High-impact or irreversible actions: always human-reviewed

• Performance drops: authority gets reduced again

Basically, treat autonomy as something an agent earns through reliable performance, not something we configure once.

It's the first question friends asked when I showed them https://convert.softorino.com, and it's fair, free converters usually pay for themselves with ads, tracking, or your files. The honest answer: the catch is that some of you will like it enough to look at the paid Mac apps I work on. That's the whole model, a good free tool as the introduction. Launch is this Sunday (Aug 30), so before then I want to hear it straight: what makes you trust a free tool, and what instantly kills that trust?