Bruno Bertapeli

Bruno Bertapeli

Building things..
7 points
GmailGoogle ChromeSpotify

About

I’m one of the pioneers of Vibe Coding. I started before the term even existed. I’ve coached dozens of creators on how to vibe code and sold over 800 courses on the topic. Now I’m building CodeDeckAI.com, using all the knowledge and real struggles that Vibe Coding users usually face.

Badges

Tastemaker
Tastemaker
Gone streaking
Gone streaking

Forums

Bruno Bertapeli

14d ago

CodeDeck - Launching my own take on a vibe coding tool

CodeDeck is not just another AI coding tool. While most platforms focus on developers, CodeDeck is built for non-technical creators. Start from ready-to-use blueprints for SaaS, apps, or ecommerce with Stripe, databases, and APIs already connected. Customize everything with AI, deploy with one click, and keep full ownership of your code. No vendor lock-in. Just build real products, faster.
Gabe Perez

12mo ago

Does it matter if your app was purely "vibe coded" for acquisitions?

I've been having a lot of fun exploring AI and using tools like @Cursor, @bolt.new, @Lovable, and @Warp to learn how to build and make some apps for myself! I'm also noticing a tremendous amount of growth in folks creating their own apps using these same tools which has me wondering... if a company wanted to acquire someone's app or tool that was built via vibe coding, would it matter how it was built? Does the method of how it was built impact the valuation?
In my idealistic eyes, I'd like to think it doesn't. As an acquisition is often much more than just the tech but also the user base, brand, and even team behind the product. If anything I think that acquiring a product that has been "vibe coded" and putting them into capable engineering hands would only enhance the product...or a least make the code base cleaner.
I also believe that talent that is able to create stunning products with AI is currently a small percentage of folks, and that companies should be investing in acquiring that talent (either independently or via product acquisition) so that they can stay ahead in innovation while learning how to implement AI tools more efficiently in their orgs.
Very curious to hear what you all think!

Gabe Perez

12mo ago

Does it matter if your app was purely "vibe coded" for acquisitions?

I've been having a lot of fun exploring AI and using tools like @Cursor, @bolt.new, @Lovable, and @Warp to learn how to build and make some apps for myself! I'm also noticing a tremendous amount of growth in folks creating their own apps using these same tools which has me wondering... if a company wanted to acquire someone's app or tool that was built via vibe coding, would it matter how it was built? Does the method of how it was built impact the valuation?
In my idealistic eyes, I'd like to think it doesn't. As an acquisition is often much more than just the tech but also the user base, brand, and even team behind the product. If anything I think that acquiring a product that has been "vibe coded" and putting them into capable engineering hands would only enhance the product...or a least make the code base cleaner.
I also believe that talent that is able to create stunning products with AI is currently a small percentage of folks, and that companies should be investing in acquiring that talent (either independently or via product acquisition) so that they can stay ahead in innovation while learning how to implement AI tools more efficiently in their orgs.
Very curious to hear what you all think!

View more