One of the best things about VCs and accelerators is that they bring founders together - which often leads to collaboration, cross-sell, and unexpected product ideas.
Built for the folks who work with photos and videos on a daily basis, Studio is the workflow-agnostic media workspace; It doesn t just analyze the media you upload to it, it builds an agentic visual memory and runs workflows to understand and act on your team s photos and videos.
Support our launch https://www.producthunt.com/prod...
Anthropic just shipped Opus 4.7 today and i had to write about it somewhere because the jump is weird.
I ran the same backlog task on 4.6 and 4.7 back to back. same repo, same prompt, same tools. 4.6 looped on a bug for 25 minutes and was not going to solve it. 4.7 closed it in eleven, and the part that freaked me out is that it paused in the middle to sanity-check an assumption i had not asked it to check. literally wrote "before i write this migration, let me verify the actual shape of the response object, because my assumption here might be wrong" and then went and verified it. unprompted.
That self-verification behavior is the thing. Vercel is reporting it does proofs on systems code before starting work. Hex says it flags missing data instead of making up plausible-but-wrong fallbacks. Genspark measured loop rates on hard queries and 4.7 basically stopped looping. different teams, different harnesses, same pattern.
Production-ready code with minimal oversight, and it can verify its own outputs More control over reasoning effort 3x better vision (now up to 3.75MP images) Improved instruction following and overall reliability New xhigh reasoning mode for finer control between speed and depth
Same pricing as Opus 4.6 ($5 and $25 per million input and output tokens). The new tokenizer can use around 1.0 to 1.35x more tokens depending on content, though this can be managed through effort settings and task budgets.
I've always been on the personal brand side. More and more founders are building it now (sometimes even before the product is ready while it's still in development, before seed fundraising). The CEO builds their position so the product sells more easily at the official launch.
But I have experience with people who built the product, scaled it, and only then did we discover who was behind it.
Honestly, with the first approach, I'd be concerned that people invest more in me as a person than in the product. People would idealise the founder and overlook the product's flaws (which could hurt development and constructive feedback).
+ I noticed the most common mistake that many people who started building a personal brand first, connected their product to their personal accounts (emails, social media, etc.) and started having a problem selling these things, because they cannot "give someone keys" to their personal profiles.
What it is: ClarifierAI is an iOS keyboard extension that improves your writing with AI directly where you type no switching apps, no copy-pasting.
How it works: You type normally, tap the Clarify button, and AI rewrites/fixes/translates your text inline. Changed words are highlighted so you can tap to revert individual edits you don't like.
I genuinely love listening to podcasts. It's one of the best ways I've found to stay on top of new trends, pick up strategies I wouldn't have discovered otherwise, and come across founders and operators I'd never stumble on through regular reading.
So I'm always on the lookout for new ones worth adding to the rotation.
It featured individuals who managed to build significant profit while running their businesses solo, without employees. Until now, I ve seen these more as exceptions rather than the norm.
