Hey Product Hunt!

We just went live with the SigmaMind MCP Server, and we re on a mission to end "infrastructure hell" for voice developers.

For the last year at SigmaMind (YC S22), we ve watched builders struggle to stitch together telephony, low-latency models, and fragmented APIs.
Today, we re changing that. We ve built a way to configure and deploy production-grade voice agents directly from your IDE (Cursor, Claude Code, etc.) using the Model Context Protocol. No more manual glue - just one prompt to connect your model, pick a voice, and get a live phone number.

We d love your feedback on the launch today:

Hey everyone!

We kept hearing from developers: building a voice agent means jumping between dashboards, docs, and your IDE before writing a line of actual logic. So we brought the entire setup into the IDE.

Hey everyone - wanted to share directly with our community first.

SigmaMind MCP Server goes live on Product Hunt at 12:01 AM EST Monday April 13 (12:31 PM IST).

It lets developers build and deploy voice AI agents directly from Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, etc. - one natural language prompt, every setting configurable.

If you follow this page you'll get notified automatically when we go live. Would genuinely love your feedback on launch day: https://www.producthunt.com/prod...

Hey everyone! With the landscape for building voice agents shifting lately, it feels like we re moving away from heavy, manual API orchestration toward something more streamlined.

How you re currently architecting voice agents. Specifically: Have you used the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to build or provide real-time data/context to your voice agents? Does it actually streamline your tool-calling, or is it more trouble than it's worth?

Would love to hear what's working (and what's breaking) in your current workflow. Drop your thoughts below!

Update: The Deel Leaderboard will no longer be going ahead today for the Paris event.

We re teaming up with The Pitch by @Deel, a global startup competition where up to 100 winners will receive $50k in funding and up to 10 winners will receive $1M+.

Every day, after launching, makers are contacted on LinkedIn and X by people offering to sell votes. As the Product Hunt team, we are very much aware of this and really hate it. We have systems in place to neutralize this type of gaming. Every vote counts for a different number of points on Product Hunt. A couple examples:

• An account with a recently created gmail address and no history of quality contributions on Product Hunt: this vote will count for 0 points. Yes, this might be a well intentioned user, but we take a conservative approach to protect the community. If the account has a company email or applies for verification on Product Hunt, that's a different story.

• An account with a company email address linked to a legitimate LinkedIn account with a history of meaningful contributions on Product Hunt: this vote carries significant weight.

A couple questions for the community:

• Are there specific accounts on Product Hunt that you suspect participate in vote selling? You can reply here or email report@producthunt.co

• What would you want to see us do differently here?