Meta question, but it's been on my mind since I had a post rejected and, rereading it, agreed with the rejection.
The difference I've landed on: content is written to be agreed with. An insight is written to be argued with. Content says "here are five lessons." An insight says "here's the one thing I believe that you might not, and here's why."
The test I now run before posting: could someone reasonably disagree with this? If not, it's content. If yes, and I can defend it, it's worth posting.
I'm curious whether other people have their own test, especially people who post here regularly and don't get rejected. What's the thing you check before hitting submit?
Comment "HERE" and I'll DM you a code for 50% off: Enclave Pro for just $2.50 (normally $5), one time, yours forever.
What is Enclave? It turns your Mac's notch into a command center: music with live lyrics, your next meeting, files, widgets, and live updates from AI coding agents like Claude Code, all one hover away.
I have been thinking about how much time we spend explaining the same things to AI over & over again. Our projects, preferences, day to day work & past decisions, sometimes it feels like conversations are same & starting it from scratch. As I'm working on this problem, i'm interested how others here handle it.
Some questions like Do you keep your notes to AI, feed them every information? & just rely on built in AI Memory? Do you have any better way to keep your context organized?
