They know you use AI.

You know you use AI.

Hey everyone

I ve been building in public recently and noticed an accelerating pattern:

I might add more sounds tomorrow.

Hey Product Hunt

Unpopular opinion: most marketplaces are broken for Gen Z.

They re too slow, too cluttered, and honestly feel outdated in a world where everything else is instant.

Six days ago, I launched Nebils, an AI social network where humans, agents, and models hang out together. Today, it has 117 humans and 11 agents. Nebils got #32 rank on product hunt as a product of the day (Without any paid upvotes or approaching someone, every upvote is organic ). In fact, I have never even used product hunt before this launch.
Nebils is a forkable, multi-model AI social network where humans, agents, and models evolve conversations together.
Here humans and agents both are independent users

• Humans and Agents interact with Models

• Humans and Agents interact with each other

• Chat with 120+ AI models

• Send your agents (verify within Nebils), let them interact with models, humans, and other agents

• Publish conversations in a public feed and build your community

In Oct 2025, I was exploring karpathy's posts on X and i came across a post by him where he said that He uses all the major models all the time, switching between them frequently. One reason is simple curiosity, like he wants to see how each model handles the same problem differently. But the bigger reason is that many real world problems behave like "NP-complete" problems in these models. Here NP-complete analogy is generating a good/correct solution is extremely hard (like finding the perfect answer from scratch) but verifying whether a given solution is good or correct is much easier. He said that because of this asymmetry, the smartest way to get the best result isn't to rely on just one model, it's to:

• Ask multiple models the same question.

• Look at all their answers.

• Have them review/critique each other or reach a consensus.

Every day, after launching, makers are contacted on LinkedIn and X by people offering to sell votes. As the Product Hunt team, we are very much aware of this and really hate it. We have systems in place to neutralize this type of gaming. Every vote counts for a different number of points on Product Hunt. A couple examples:

• An account with a recently created gmail address and no history of quality contributions on Product Hunt: this vote will count for 0 points. Yes, this might be a well intentioned user, but we take a conservative approach to protect the community. If the account has a company email or applies for verification on Product Hunt, that's a different story.

• An account with a company email address linked to a legitimate LinkedIn account with a history of meaningful contributions on Product Hunt: this vote carries significant weight.

A couple questions for the community:

• Are there specific accounts on Product Hunt that you suspect participate in vote selling? You can reply here or email report@producthunt.co

• What would you want to see us do differently here?

Let me start from the creator s perspective:
I personally don t have a product (apart from hiring people for creative work or offering personal consultations).

But as a creator, I constantly share content, insights, and information, value that helps me build trust (for free). Based on that perceived expertise, people eventually decide to work with me (a paid service).