All activity
When your API fails, Pinghawk shows exactly what happened — at the moment it failed.
Instead of a generic “API is down” alert, it records DNS, TLS, TTFB, and the response body — so you know why it failed, not just that it failed.
It captures multiple snapshots across failures and catches silent issues like cron jobs and SSL expiry.
Free during beta — would love your feedback if this solves a real pain for you.

Pinghawk — Know Why APIs BreakSee exactly what happened at the moment your API failed
Riyon Sebastianstarted a discussion
“API is down” — but by the time you check, it’s already fine
This has happened to me more times than I can count. You get an alert that an API is down. You open logs, dashboards, traces… and everything looks normal again. No clear signal of what actually failed. Most of the time, the only thing you know is: something broke — briefly — and recovered. But that’s exactly when the useful context is gone. I started paying more attention to where failures...
Riyon Sebastianleft a comment
Hey everyone - I’m Riyon, the solo maker of Pinghawk 👋 I built this after hitting the same problem over and over: you get an alert that an API is down… but by the time you check, everything’s working again - and there’s no useful context. Most tools tell you something failed. They don’t tell you why. Pinghawk captures what actually happened at the exact moment of failure - DNS timing, TLS...

Pinghawk — Know Why APIs BreakSee exactly what happened at the moment your API failed
Riyon Sebastianleft a comment
I’ve been using Resend for a while and it’s been one of the easiest email tools I’ve worked with so far. The CLI direction is interesting - I can see this being really useful when you’re deep in development and don’t want to keep switching contexts. Curious how people are actually using this with AI agents in practice.

Resend CLI 2.0Built for humans, AI agents, and CI/CD pipelines
Riyon Sebastianleft a comment
I’ve been using Claude pretty regularly for coding and problem solving, and one thing I’ve really appreciated is how well it handles longer, more complex tasks compared to most tools. There have been quite a few times where I didn’t have to keep re-explaining context, which made a big difference when working through multi-step problems. Curious how much further 4.7 pushes this, especially...

Claude Opus 4.7Claude’s most capable model for reasoning and agentic coding
