All activity
Steriani Karamanlisleft a comment
the switching decision is harder than it looks. same model, different vendor, prices vary up to 6x once you normalize for context window, caching availability, and output weight. most people pick a provider once and never revisit it. but the market has shifted enough in the last few months that what made sense 6 months ago probably isn't optimal today. worth running the actual numbers before...
Running OpenClaw with Claude subs is dead. Now what?
fmerianJoin the discussion
Steriani Karamanlisleft a comment
Week 12 AIPI data is live. The number that surprised us most this week: buying inference direct from a model developer costs 7x more per input token than buying the same model through a third-party platform. The output gap is 5.2x. Most developers never compare because they pick a vendor early and stick with it. We track 2,614 SKUs across 47 vendors weekly. Free MCP server for live pricing in...

ATOMThe global price benchmark for AI inference
6x more depending on where you buy it. ATOM tracks 2,600+ SKUs across 47+ vendors weekly and publishes the AIPI every Monday.
Three products: ATOM MCP (works natively in Claude and Cursor), ATOM Terminal for analysts and FinOps teams, and ATOM Feed for enterprise data licensing.
Know what inference actually costs.

ATOMThe global price benchmark for AI inference
Steriani Karamanlisleft a comment
Hey Product Hunt. Stamos here, co-founder of ATOM. We built this after watching too many teams get blindsided by their inference bills. The same model costs 16x more depending on where you buy it. Output tokens run 3.84x more than input on average. Nobody talks about this until the bill arrives. We spent a year building a real index for inference pricing. Not a scraper. A chained matched model...

ATOMThe global price benchmark for AI inference
