Let me start from the creator s perspective:
I personally don t have a product (apart from hiring people for creative work or offering personal consultations).

But as a creator, I constantly share content, insights, and information, value that helps me build trust (for free). Based on that perceived expertise, people eventually decide to work with me (a paid service).

TL;DR: Anthropic refused to sign a contract with the Pentagon that would have allowed the U.S. military to use all of its models without restrictions. Anthropic insisted on an exception, and brace yourself, that its models cannot be used: 1) for mass surveillance of citizens, 2) for autonomous killing. Now the administration is threatening that if the founder of Anthropic doesn't change his mind by a certain date, they will come after him.

Google, OpenAI, and Musk (Grok) have all signed the contract.

Following Sam Altman's announcement over the past few hours, people have been speaking out massively about cancelling their OpenAI subscriptions and subscribing to Claude.

When mass layoffs started in tech, many people suggested that:

1. The layoffs were happening because, during COVID, companies hired too many people for online and remote roles.

2. That AI was attacking jobs.

And I still keep seeing statements from creators of various AI tools saying:
No, AI won t replace you. Employees will just have time for more meaningful tasks in a company.

Are you in favour of banning social media for users under 16?

Recently, there has been a surge of laws and restrictions targeting social media platforms for young users.

Recently, I asked how much you trust AI agents.

When it comes to finances, you said you don t.
With health data, you don t either.

But now I have a different question.

Wherever you code (online, CLI, or IDE), everyone has some love, hate or horror vibe coding stories, from building a prod-ready app in minutes to the whole repo got wiped. Would love to hear your story.

Building my app with AI tools, zero coding background. The magic part - I can ship features in hours. The scary part - I have no idea if the code is actually good.

Right now my "QA process" is:

- Does it work when I tap around?

- Did anything break that worked before?

Hey PH family.

Been part of this community for years now, and if there's one place to talk with builders, this is it.

AI dev tools are evolving crazy fast , every few weeks there s a new must-try for vibe coders.

Some people are building full products with @ChatGPT by OpenAI and @Replit , others swear by @Cursor and @Claude by Anthropic , and a few are mixing @Lovable + @v0 by Vercel + @bolt.new to ship apps in record time.

I ve been refining my own vibe stack lately, trying to find that sweet spot between speed, control, and creativity.
It made me wonder ,what does your setup look like right now?

I've been thinking about something.
We've gotten really good at using AI to generate working code, but we're not treating it like production code in terms of documentation.

Traditional developers spend significant time documenting their code because they know future them (or their teammates) will need to understand, modify, or debug it later. But with AI-generated code, we often just copy-paste and move on.

The problem:

You generate a perfect solution today.

Curious what's your preference: @bolt.new @Lovable @Replit @v0 by Vercel? or else?

On Product Hunt, I can see many people launching their products using "vibe-coding tools" like @Lovable , @bolt.new , or@Replit

I reckon many people who created something with them are usually developers who didn't have enough time for building a side idea before, but with AI, they could make it happen.