We built AI that's constrained to your component library - so it can't go off-brand

Something we kept seeing across every enterprise team we work with: AI design tools generate fast, then the cleanup takes longer than building from scratch.

The pattern is always the same. The AI generates a beautiful dashboard. Everyone's impressed. Then someone looks closely. Wrong button variant. Spacing doesn't match the system. The card uses a shadow you deprecated months ago. The loading state doesn't exist. A developer receives it and rebuilds everything using the real components anyway.

The generation was fast. The aftermath was expensive.

I am right now in the last effort to publish Skyty 1.2 with a new NightSky Feature to identify star, planets and constellations on night flights. Hope to be able to release within next days. Let me know if you're interested in a TestFlight.

Here's the problem nobody talks about.

Your data doesn't match. GA4 says one thing. Search Console says another. Your CRM says something else. They're all tracking the same campaign, same time period, and they give you different numbers .

This isn't a bug. It's how the systems are built. GA4 measures sessions and modeled behavior. Google Ads measures ad interactions. Search Console provides aggregated impression data. Your CRM tracks identified leads . They were never designed to agree.

The result? You spend hours trying to "fix" the numbers instead of acting on them.
Imagine this : having an operating system for SEO & GEO, that actually reads your Google Analytics, your GSC, Bing webmaster, treat your data, explain it to you, and ACT!

Have a social media audience of developers, or help people get their @OpenClaw up and running? You can earn 30% recurring revenue on every @KiloClaw sale you refer.

Creators. Consultants. Integrators. All are welcome.

1. I've always been on the personal brand side. More and more founders are building it now (sometimes even before the product is ready while it's still in development, before seed fundraising). The CEO builds their position so the product sells more easily at the official launch.

2. But I have experience with people who built the product, scaled it, and only then did we discover who was behind it.

Honestly, with the first approach, I'd be concerned that people invest more in me as a person than in the product. People would idealise the founder and overlook the product's flaws (which could hurt development and constructive feedback).

+ I noticed the most common mistake that many people who started building a personal brand first, connected their product to their personal accounts (emails, social media, etc.) and started having a problem selling these things, because they cannot "give someone keys" to their personal profiles.

Hey all,

One of the most important and challenging experiences you ll have as a founder is fundraising.