... same process-global unlock, and arbitrary shell means read current state can still disclose secrets, hit side-effecting endpoints, acquire locks, or broaden what the model sees. So if I add scoped capabilities, I d model a **bounded observation capability**, not a blanket read capability: same actor/trigger/target/provider, specific observables

... headed browser that can be controlled through a browser automation protocol while still being visible and interactive. The test runner can connect to the browser, drive the page, take screenshots, and preserve a realistic session, while the team can observe what is actually happening. That combination is especially useful for agentic testing: - The agent can operate against a real headed browser session. - The harness can capture screenshots at meaningful checkpoints. - Developers can watch the run instead of reading only logs ... ... worker. For UI testing, a remote headed browser is not just a convenience. It changes the debugging loop. Instead of asking "what did the script think happened?", you can ask "what did the user actually see?" ### Harness Code vs

... silent on everything else, so the control layer is the thing you consult when you choose to, but it reaches out to you for approvals and cascade-failures rather than waiting to be observed. Observability

... nika): @danishlynx  Cool, then let me know on the launch day :) Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @indu_thangamuthu  I noticed because of the dashes :D Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @couldashouldawoulda  :D Teenage vs AI agents. I would trust AI agents more in this case :D I know teenagers :D Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @lzhgus  Has anytime happened that your AI agent did something wrong? What was the worst thing? Comment from ... ... with no structure? those are the ones i don't trust Comment from nim(@sup_nim): honestly i think the trust issue comes down to scope. i trust ai way more when its doing one specific thing really well vs