... actually said. The failure mode that gets me: a rewrite pass can turn a hedge into a certainty ("may improve" becomes "improves"), or quietly shift a number, without any of it looking like an error. It reads perfectly clean. Spellcheck and grammar tools won't catch it because grammatically it's fine it's just no longer accurate to the source. For those of you publishing AI-assisted content regularly: Do you manually re-check every rewritten claim against your ... ... case of this drift before it went out? Is this a real problem for your workflow, or am I overthinking it? Not looking for "just read it carefully" curious if anyone's found something that actually works at scale, versus

... Nobody questions someone's competence for using a calculator, a spellchecker, a design template, or an IDE autocomplete. Using a tool to help execute an idea is normal everywhere else. But the second writing involves AI even when the person had the actual idea and used AI just to help draft or refine it there's an instant judgment that doesn't apply anywhere else. Genuinely curious what people think: is this really about output quality, or is it more ...

... powered by Hunspell. Pick a language per profile during setup or any time in manage profiles, toggle it with ctrl+k , and use prosaic --languages to browse all 80+ supported codes. A few smaller things: the status bar shows spellcheck:on/off (contributed as a community PR!), the Git status hides when you're not in a repo, and new piece titles auto-format to Title Case. 1.5.1 also makes invalid language codes fail loudly. Also, if you upgrade, you will ... ... taken right into setting up the new spellcheck

... last decade, we ve treated Code Review as a necessary evil. We accepted that to have quality, we had to sacrifice speed. We forced our most senior engineers to spend 40% of their week acting as human spellcheckers. They scroll through diffs, hunting for missing semicolons or unused imports, their eyes glazing over. The result? The "LGTM" Trap . Reviewers get tired. They stop looking deep. They type "Looks Good To Me" just to unblock you, missing the actual logic error ...

... good and the bad. Comment from Ghost Kitty(@ghost-kitty-7676621): Comment Deleted Comment from Arthur Lee(@arthur_lee6): @byalexai   @busmark_w_nika  Interesting take! Reddit's move does feel like a double-edged sword protecting data vs. preserving history. NGL, it's wild how much AI relies on Reddit threads, given the chaos in some discussions. Balancing act for sure. Comment from saqib abbas(@saqib_abbas3): @byalexai   No, I don t think ... ... searches. Comment from Ben Mulch(@ben_mulch): I wouldn't hate it if this meant I didn't run into 8 year old threads at the top of my Google searches. E.g. asked Google today "why is mac's spellcheck