Aditya Vellanki

Assemblr - Find workflow gaps and automate them instantly

by
Most teams already have workflows without agents. They’re just scattered across tools and repeated manually. Assemblr connects to your stack and analyzes activity. It reconstructs how work actually happens, surfaces recurring workflows, and identifies gaps where similar tasks are handled inconsistently or missed. Instead of guessing what to automate, you start from real behavior and turn it into systems that reduce manual work, fix inconsistencies, and save time across your team every day.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Aditya Vellanki
Hey everyone, Aditya here, one of the builders behind Assemblr. This started from something that felt… off. Every team I worked with had “workflows,” but no one could actually point to them. Things just happened. A Slack message would turn into a GitHub issue, then a Linear ticket, then a PR, then a Notion doc. The same pattern, over and over again. But no one ever defined it. No system tracked it. And because of that, everyone kept repeating it manually. At first I thought the problem was automation. But the more I looked at it, the more it felt like something deeper. Teams don’t lack automation. They lack visibility. You can’t automate what you don’t clearly see. And inside most companies, work is fragmented across tools. Similar tasks get handled differently depending on who’s doing them. Things slip through. Context gets lost. The same workflow might run 50 times a week, but slightly differently each time. That’s where Assemblr came from. Instead of asking teams to define workflows, we tried to discover them. Assemblr connects to your tools and looks at real activity over time, not just individual events but sequences. It starts reconstructing how work actually flows across your stack. You begin to see patterns you didn’t explicitly define. You see where things are consistent, and where they break. You see where similar data isn’t being connected properly. And once that’s visible, you can actually fix it. That’s where the time savings come in. A lot of this work today is invisible overhead. Context switching, manual coordination, repeating the same steps. When you surface and standardize those workflows, you’re not just saving a few clicks, you’re removing entire layers of repetitive effort across a team. One thing that surprised us during testing is how immediate the reaction is. People don’t question whether it’s accurate. They recognize it instantly. It’s something they’ve been doing every day, just never saw as a system. This is still early, and we’re learning a lot as we go. Would genuinely love to hear from you: Does this match how work feels in your team? Where do you think something like this breaks? What workflows would you want a system like this to pick up? Happy to answer anything, and really appreciate you checking it out 🙏