Factiverse AI-Editor - Find factual mistakes in AI-generated content

@andrew_maxwell1 Hello Maxwell :) Thank you!

@pavelvaks Thanks so much for your feedback! We are looking at making the editor available as a plug-in, would make it even more accessible! You can paste any type of text, not necessarily only from ChatGPT! Our model then performs live search in Google, Bing and Wikipedia before ranking and presenting the most credible sources supporting or disputing the sentences in your text!

@gautek Thanks for the reply! the plug-in will be a great way to expand and ease the usage (Grammarly-like usage, instead of copy-pasting to a dedicated editor) the other note is just to point out that the generic use case is super interesting regardless of the origin of the text (personally - finding false facts from real people interests me more)

@gautek @pavelvaks Thank you for the feedback. What if we integrate chatgpt in our service, so that you can generate text you need and run a credibility check right away? Would that be easier then copy pasting?

Hi @maria_amelie IMHO, the more impactful use case here is to fact-check data from the web (tweets, news, and even speeches and interviews) rather than data that is generated using AI. For this case, I don't think the chatGPT integration will work

@yuriy_yunikov Thank you!

@yuriy_yunikov We were careful to choose which data we can train on, mainly articles from highly credible newsrooms and fact-checkers. First we identify a fact-check worthy sentence, and then we search in Google and Bing to find relevant sources. We are not just showing the first thing that pops up there, but sort results based on the historical training data from newsrooms. So if historically certain websites are more credible on certain topics - we will show them in the results on that topic:)

@juliomedina Thank you!

@notionbae Same here!! Thanks for your kind words!

@deds3t Thanks Dennis! Technology is a two-edged sword ;) We're not blacklisting or whitelisting any pages - but every time we do a search we also look at historical credibility for the source. So if you have a history of being credible around climate change, you'd rank higher for that topic, but not necessarily for inflation or economy. Our CTO @vinaysetty can also add to this!

@carter_wang Thanks, Carter! Yes, that would be great! I'll dm you.

@staticmaker1 Thanks a lot, David! We tried not to re-invent the wheel, but to keep i clean!

@staticmaker1 @gautek Thank you so much. Our website has undergone so many transformations, as well as the product - it is a never-ending process.

@hussain_ahmed3 Thank you:-)

@petter_selvikvag_berge thank you!