Zeejah Qazilbash

SharePay introduction

by
My name is Zeejah and I’m currently building SharePay, a fintech platform designed to make shared payments and repayment agreements easier to manage. The idea came from a personal experience. I booked a trip with friends and paid upfront, then had to chase everyone to pay me back. One person never paid and it made the situation awkward. I realised this happens constantly between friends, groups and even small businesses with customers. SharePay solves this with two core features: SharePay Split allows users to split payments before a transaction is completed, so one person doesn’t have to pay upfront and chase everyone later. SharePay Promise allows individuals and businesses to create structured repayment agreements with clear terms, repayment schedules and automated reminders. The goal is to remove the awkwardness of chasing money and create accountability around repayments. We’ve built the MVP and validated demand through surveys and early feedback. Right now I’m focusing on refining the B2B version of Promise so businesses can use it as a flexible invoicing and instalment payment tool. I’d love feedback on: • The product positioning • The B2B invoicing / instalment use case • Go to market strategies for early users • Potential integrations with platforms where people already owe money (marketplaces, service platforms, etc).
7 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Adam Jabbar

Really like this idea Zeejah, the "chasing money" problem is real and the B2B instalment angle is smart.

One thing worth thinking about as you refine the B2B version: the moment you introduce structured repayment agreements with clear terms and schedules, you're creating legally binding documents between parties. Most platforms in this space have very thin Terms of Service that don't actually define what happens when someone defaults on a repayment schedule or disputes a charge.

That gap becomes your biggest customer support headache at scale. Worth getting ahead of it before you onboard serious B2B clients.

What does your current user agreement look like for the Promise feature?

Zeejah Qazilbash
@adamjabbar Thank you, I really appreciate that insight. You are absolutely right that once structured repayment agreements are introduced the legal framework becomes extremely important, especially when businesses start relying on the platform. With SharePay Promise, the intention from the start has been to treat these agreements as digitally signed repayment contracts between the parties, not just a simple payment reminder system. When a Promise is created, both parties agree to the amount, repayment schedule, and terms, and that agreement is stored within the platform. We are currently working on building the legal layer around this so that the agreements clearly define things such as repayment obligations, dispute processes, and what happens in the case of missed payments or defaults. The goal is to ensure that businesses using SharePay for instalments or invoices have clarity and protection rather than relying on vague terms of service. At the moment the user agreement outlines the structure of the Promise, the responsibilities of both parties, and how repayment schedules are recorded and acknowledged digitally, but we are actively refining it with legal guidance as the B2B use case expands. Long term the aim is for SharePay to act as the infrastructure that records, schedules, and enforces repayment agreements, rather than just facilitating payments. That legal clarity is definitely something we are prioritising before onboarding larger B2B partners.
Adam Jabbar

@zeejah this is a really thoughtful response and it's clear you've already thought well beyond just building a payment tool. The fact that you're treating Promise as a digitally signed contract between parties rather than a glorified reminder is what separates this from the dozen other split payment apps out there. That framing matters a lot.

One concrete thing worth getting right early on the legal side since you're actively building it: the clause that causes the most trouble in platforms like this isn't the repayment schedule itself, it's how you define a default. Best practice is to spell out exactly what counts as a default, missed payments, insolvency, or other breaches, include a short cure period giving the other party a chance to fix it before any action kicks in, and add a catchall so anything not explicitly listed still qualifies. Most platforms skip the cure period and it becomes their biggest source of disputes down the line.

Zeejah Qazilbash
@adamjabbar Thanks, really appreciate the thoughtful feedback, especially around the default clause and cure period, that’s super helpful as we refine the legal structure of Promise. If you have a moment, I’d love for you to download the SharePay MVP and try it out. Any feedback on the experience, contracts, or repayment flow would be really valuable while we’re still iterating. You can check it out here: https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/sh... Would love to hear your thoughts after trying it.
Zeejah Qazilbash
Quick question for any freelancers or founders, would you use a tool that lets customers pay invoices in instalments with automated payment scheduling (legally backed invoices)?