*as i currently understand it* - Apple Watch seems to me to be, most importantly, a technological bridge to allow Apple to offer Apple Pay via NFC to its iPhone 5/5s existing users. Ones who won't / cant' yet upgrade to iPhone 6 (believe it has the proper BTLE for the pairing - someone pls educate me if I am way off)
This helps address the immediately one of the chief obstacles to building a payment network: Metcalfe's Law. By putting a lower (ok - relatively lower lol) price point on the Apple Watch, Apple may have hacked its own adoption cycle for mobile payments through what almost amounts to backwards compatibility.
@kjemperud I'm not sure either - but I think that all of the "open your hotel door with your watch" stuff that is coming out almost definitely requires NFC - don't think that can reliably be accomplished yet with iBeacon/BTLE only
@basche42 Yes, that's what I thought. Making it compatible with the iPhone 5S, 5, 5C as well seems like a bridge to bring the payment system to existing customers. But how many will actually get the watch? 5% of existing customers?
Is TouchID required for the payment system? If so, the iPhone 5 and 5C will fall short.
Will you have to enter the "fallback"-password beforehand?
It's interesting to think about that inconvenience to enter the password as an incentive to upgrade your phone then.
Things Apple got right:
- Personalization
- Price
- Crown interface (great way to manage the Apple Watch)
Things Apple got wrong:
- Battery (no mention = bad news)
- I can't find a killer feature that will make regular people buy this.
Overall, it's a product I'll get, but it's tough to say whether regular folks will covet it. I need to play to know.
Report
@benparr Great breakdown, especially on the bad news about battery life (Re/Code reports that Apple reps told them it'll need a re-charge every night). I think this version of the watch will be a lot like the original iPhone. It'll be a device that draws a lot of attention in the wild, but it will take the second or third versions to really catch on with massive adoption.
Not a fan. iPod was, "all your CDs in your pocket" - a unique value - it made your CDs unnecessary. Then iPhone made iPods unnecessary. And iPhone made wearing a watch unnecessary too. But the Apple Watch is currently an accessory to your phone. Meh. You know what would've been cool? If Apple Watch made your iPhone unnecessary. That's the kind of vision I want from Apple - or at least the expectation they've built for me.
@eriktorenberg i think elaboration would be really interesting here. i feel like for a lot of people it was the exact opposite, where google glass was the future and actually seemed innovative, whereas the watch wasn't all too different from the existing smartwatches out there, and didn't have any *must-have* features.
@krrishd Apple creates hardware, software, and peopleware. It cultivates, builds and eases us into new behavior, even when the particular technology(ies) have been around for some time. What results is Thiel's "Last Mover Advantage" as we wait for Apple to bless each new product category.
@basche42 agreed, but what would make it something someone "really wanted" in your opinion? a lot of the stuff has been around for a while, and I agree that Apple is innovative in that it'll bring it to the forefront, but what feature really makes it worth the price tag?
@krrishd Not sure - and great question. I suspect for mass market it will be the health aspect (they also can recruit a much richer app ecosystem at first than any of the android health wearables).
I'm really looking forward to seeing what the WatchKit SDK will allow. Definitely will allow custom notifications from existing apps like the Facebook and Twitter examples, but what will Watch-only apps look like?
Other questions on my mind:
- How do you download apps onto the Watch?
- What is the battery life like?
- Will there be a marketplace for watch faces? Potential side income website? Noticed someone just bought applewatchfaces.com today
Battery life? Waterproof? Storage? Connectivity (besides BLE)? - This is stuff they will be working on in the next few months I think. Nothing major regarding today's presentation (ability to show it), but imho major regarding usability etc. when a gazillion people are going to buy this thing (including moi)
Report
I liked the innovation of digital crown to replace pinch gestures. Yet, the demo seemed a bit confusing. There were times when using the crown would make sense to me, but Kevin Lynch swiped instead. And visa-versa. Swipe on a watch seems like a poor gesture, and I thought the crown would replace it. The crown plus the addition of haptic touches and voice I think makes most sense for main interactions.
I'm hoping a hands-on demo will alleviate my fears about this.
EDIT: Digital crown is the new iPod clickwheel
@eric3000 I noticed the same thing. I think it might have been because the demo watch was not on his wrist. It might make more sense to use the crown then.
Will be very interesting to see who cracks the code on the actual usage of these devices. Not convinced I need one yet, and am enjoying a watch-free lifestyle since I stopped wearing one a few years back. Holds a lot of promise. Also, no battery life announcements- that will be interesting to see too.
Report
$349 is a steep starting point -- what will the 18-carat gold version cost? :) Also, is the Apple Watch just an accessory given that you still will need the iPhone nearby as you'll be using its GPS and WiFi capabilities?
Glances could be pretty cool, as a competitor to Google Now cards on Android Wear. Lots of fun stuff to hack together there. The card metaphor lives on! And then combine that with the Taptic Engine (not to be confused with the haptic one).
My biggest beef with Kevin Lynch's demo:
He should have been demoing the watch while it was on his wrist!!
Report
iPod nano on a strap?
From what I've heard of the Moto 360, the round face creates issues with web content unless it's designed specifically for a round screen. I'm not buying a smart-watch until that's sorted and the fact that the iWatch is rectangle, to me means Apple have consciously backed off trying to make it work. Which in my eyes is a cop out.
I think the big feature in the watch will be payment. Your wallet on your wrist - that has some value.
@Simonatpaddle Rectangular watches have been a thing since even before digital faces. I own multiple rectangular watches, analog and digital. I think that design decision makes perfect sense given the vast majority of content to be shown on the screen.
Replies
flock
Teleport
flock
flock
Octane AI
Reboot Podcast #33 - Do I Even Have A Superpower?
Backchannel
/ syndicate
AI Sphere Quiz
flock
AI Sphere Quiz
flock
AfterHour
Startup Stash
Teleport
The Cold Start Problem
CryptoPoops
a16z - Advertising vs. Micropayments in the Age of Ad Blockers