Are AI-built apps creating a new launch QA problem?

I’ve been building PageLens AI after seeing the same thing over and over again with AI-built websites and apps.

The product looks “done”.

But then you look properly and find the stuff that gets missed when people are shipping fast:

Missing security headers
Weak mobile CTAs
Poor accessibility basics
Broken social previews
SEO basics not set up

Analytics/consent problems
Confusing copy
No clear trust signals
Logged-in routes that nobody has properly reviewed

I don’t think this is because builders are careless.

I think tools like Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit and v0 have made it incredibly easy to build quickly, but most founders still need a proper launch-readiness pass before sending real users, investors or paid traffic to the site.

So I’m building PageLens AI as launch QA for AI-built websites and apps.

The idea is:

1. Scan your site
2. Get a ranked report of what’s hurting trust, SEO, accessibility, security, mobile UX and conversion
3. Export the fixes as Markdown for Cursor / Claude / Lovable / Bolt
4. Fix the issues
5. Re-scan and prove it improved

I’d love feedback from other makers here:

Do you run any kind of launch QA checklist before sharing a new product publicly?

Or are most people just shipping and fixing issues after users notice them?

For context, this is what I’m building:
https://www.pagelensai.com

Not looking for upvotes here, genuinely interested in whether other makers see this same gap.