I'm curious to hear from NEET aspirants, students, and educators here.
There are many online platforms for NEET preparation, but when it comes to mock tests and question practice, what features actually make a platform useful?
I built isopod.lol this week as a distribution test: 8 plates on a cartoon isopod, steal = last price + $10, PayPal for the charge.
The part other builders kept asking about was not the bow. It was how you stop two people buying the same plate, and how far you can get without a VPS.
Stack: Workers, D1, Turnstile, Access, Email Routing for the owner magic link. PayPal is the only paid vendor. Domain + whatever tiny PayPal fees you actually take. I wrote the checkout / version / webhook path here:
Over the past few weeks, I've been building Launch Pilot an AI co-founder designed to help indie hackers and solo founders launch with more confidence.
The idea came from seeing the same problems repeated over and over: shipping without validation, unclear positioning, weak ICPs, and launch plans based more on guesswork than evidence.
I m building Fluent-Qt, but I m stuck on a prioritization problem. I can keep adding controls, yet a longer component list does not tell me whether the library helps someone maintain a real desktop app. The case I care about is incremental adoption: modernizing one existing screen without replacing Qt s object model, event loop, or CMake setup, and without turning it into a full QML migration. If you maintain a Qt Widgets app, which single screen or interaction is the hardest to modernize today? What specifically makes it difficult in your codebase? I m thinking about dense data views, navigation, overlays and dialogs, or window chrome but I may be missing the real blocker. For context, here is the WebAssembly Gallery for the approach I m testing: https://calvinhxx.github.io/Flue... I ll use the replies to pick one screen for a documented integration case study and publish the before/after diff, time spent, and platform limitations.
We're going live on Product Hunt tomorrow and wanted to give this community an early heads-up
Most AI deck/doc tools make something that looks polished but falls apart when a consultant or analyst has to defend the numbers. We built WinningStrategy.ai for exactly that gap.
Hey everyone! We're putting the final touches on Will It Travel before launching on Product Hunt soon, and we'd love some fresh eyes on our positioning.
The Problem: English isn't a monolith. Phrasing, idioms, and colloquialisms that make complete sense in one region (like the US) often cause friction or confusion in others (like India, Singapore, or the UK).
What we built: A tool to analyze cross-dialectal English comprehension so builders and writers know if their copy translates clearly across global audiences.
I didn't make a million dollars sitting on a train.
I made it because of what I repeatedly did while sitting on one.
For years, I used otherwise forgettable pockets of time, commuting, waiting, sitting between things, to keep learning tech.
Sometimes it was something completely new. Sometimes it was refreshing a concept I'd forgotten. Sometimes it was learning a technology I thought would matter for the next stage of my career.
RELVE just became the first paid owner of The Only Billboard. Their ad now occupies the entire live board.
The rules are odd on purpose: there is only one ad; a new buyer replaces the current owner; the next price rises by $1; and every displaced ad remains in permanent History.
That means the empty experiment is over. RELVE bought chapter one for $1, and someone else can write chapter two for $2. It could be a startup, an artist, a community, a joke, a cause, or something nobody expects.