Do writers actually want data ownership — or just complain about platforms?
by•
Many writers say they don’t trust platforms.
They complain about:
• Vendor lock-in
• Platforms owning their content
• Sudden shutdown risks
• Algorithmic feeds cheapening their writing
So I built FranzKafka.xyz around a simple idea:
You connect your own database.
Bring Your Own Database. Your Supabase. Your backend. Your data.
No lock-in. No hostage situation. You can unplug anytime.
But here’s the real question:
Do people actually want ownership?
Or are we more comfortable complaining about platforms than taking responsibility for our own infrastructure?
Would love honest opinions —
Is data sovereignty something writers will adopt?
Or is convenience always going to win?
15 views
Replies
vibecoder.date
People want ownership and convenience.
But beyond ownership, they want a guarantee that their data is secure, confidential, and not being used for purposes other than the service.
I've bounced around writing setups, from neovim and gitea, to proton docs, to just documents and local backup.
But that's for writing tools.
Truth is we want it all, all consumers do, we all want maximum value out of products.
So as someone who could be construed as a writer, here is what I want.
Zero knowledge and zero trust arch, my data is secure, untouched unless it's being used for something I initiate, like editing a document or exporting one. I am aware I may need to pay here, and I am willing to pay for the guarantee.
This means I need to trust the organization. especially when it comes to privacy.