1752.ai

Fundraising AI built by a VC. Some of us add value.

5.0•11 reviews•

701 followers

Fundraising AI built by a VC. Some of us add value.

5.0•11 reviews•

701 followers

Visit website

Startup communities

•

Investing

•

Fundraising resources

1752.ai is the fundraising platform built by 1752vc, a VC firm that reviews 10,000+ startups a year. Pressure-test your deck with the Pitch Deck Analyzer, then use 1752 Fundraising to find angels, VC firms, and family offices personalized for you from 400,000+ investors.

1752.ai Reviews

The community submitted 11 reviews to tell us what they like about 1752.ai, what 1752.ai can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 11 reviews

Review 1752.ai?

Reviewers say 1752vc Pitch Deck Analyzer gives unusually detailed, investor-style feedback that goes beyond design notes and generic AI advice. Users repeatedly praise its slide-by-slide structure, clear prioritization, and ability to catch weak market sizing, projections, narrative gaps, and contradictions while also noting what already works. Several say it feels closer to a real VC first pass than other tools. The main complaints are slower turnaround, some UX or account bugs, and a desire for more context, examples, export options, and steadier recommendations across iterations.

Summarized with AI

Pros

attention to detail (3)

developer experience (3)

useful for startups (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (1)

Other Reviews (10)

•2 reviews

What's great

developer experience (3)attention to detail (3)useful for startups (2)

I actually ran our current draft investor deck through it and found the analysis very useful. It didn’t just give us a score — it pointed out specific issues by slide and explained why they could matter to an investor. A few of the comments made me look at parts of our deck differently. I also liked that it identified what was already working well, not just what was wrong.

What needs improvement

I’d like to see a little more context behind some of the recommendations. For example, if something is flagged as critical, it would be useful to see a few examples of how strong decks typically address that issue.

vs Alternatives

We have reviewed our deck internally, received feedback from advisors and other founders, and used general AI tools to critique it. Those are helpful, but this felt different because the feedback was structured around how an investor may evaluate the deck and was tied back to specific slides.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

35 views2mo ago

•1 review

What's great

developer experience (3)high design quality (1)

You can tell this product is built by a team of experienced VCs. My pitch deck has been reviewed and validated multiple times, yet the analyzer spotted flaws in my TAM, SAM, SOM, and go-to-market capital deployment strategy. I also received outreach from 1752vc after my submission, even for the beta. I don't usually leave reviews, but had to for this deck analyzer.

What needs improvement

User experience was smooth and free. I would suggest partnerships with more VC firms to get the reviewed decks in front of more eyes. This would give startups outside their investment thesis more value from using the platform.

vs Alternatives

The metrics that validate the pitch deck are less concerned with placement and more focused on actionable metrics and valuable investor insights that are currently missing. Other pitch decks I have seen criticize irrelevant points and don't actually review the metrics.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

112 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

Be ready for some 'frank' feedback. The 1752VC Pitch Deck Analyzer is going to find all sorts of issues with your deck, and your business plan. Some of those issues won't surprise you and you probably thought you could get through an in person pitch. Other issues will give you new perspective on your business. The fact is, VCs are using AI to evaluate your pitch submissions and you better tune your deck to get over that hurdle. This tool will help get your deck through the first knock out round. Just be ready to dust off your ego and get to revising after the first review.

What needs improvement

A downloadable PDF of the feedback would be great. I've had that window open for days while I work on revisions.

vs Alternatives

I have used a few online pitch deck analysis tools and some of them are grading appearance and looking for your SOM. 1752vc's tool gets down into the details of your business plan and even regulatory hurdles that you might meet along the way. Far more in depth than anything else I have used.

Ratings

Ease of use

Value for money

Report

183 views4mo ago

•1 review

What's great

attention to detail (3)

I tested it on a new deck I recently created, and it did a genuinely thorough pass. It flagged things across my business model clarity, funding ask specifics, competitive positioning, and go-to-market strategy all in one go. The main thing that stood out to me is that it correctly identified that a market-size figure was based on total industry spend rather than the actual addressable software TAM. It also gave specific praise tied to exact slides (strong team, clear "why now" logic, an effective visual), which I found really helpful.

What needs improvement

Some parts about making my own account were buggy. Could've been a problem on my end, though.

vs Alternatives

I've tried a couple of general AI tools for this, and they tend to stop at surface-level stuff like formatting or generic "add more traction" comments. This one got into market sizing methodology, whether the ask is specific enough, and whether the narrative holds together. It's closer to what I'd expect from a real investor pass than a checklist tool.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

110 views3mo ago

•2 reviews

What's great

attention to detail (3)useful for startups (2)

I've been through two iterations with this tool, and overall I found it genuinely valuable.

What I like most is how clearly the feedback is structured. It doesn't just comment on slide design - it reviews the deck's structure, messaging, and presentation separately, making it easy to prioritize improvements. It also looks for logical inconsistencies and contradictions, essentially simulating how a real VC evaluates a startup. In my experience, that's exactly what investors do: they look for weak assumptions and places where the story doesn't hold together. This makes it a great way to pressure-test your pitch before sending it to investors.

Overall, it's a very impressive product, and I sincerely hope more startup founders use it before fundraising.

What needs improvement

One thing I'd improve is the consistency of the recommendations across iterations. In my case, after making changes based on the first review, the next review highlighted different, less important issues. After another iteration, it even suggested going back to something from my original version. That made the optimization process feel a bit circular.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

61 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

developer experience (3)

Being able to judge my pitch using a reliable, fast-tracked, accurate tool like 1752vc’s analyzer is a game changer. I struggle to create pitch-decks, and typically rely on Claude for my products. Because of this, I become fearful of missing blind spots that a human investor would catch immediately. 1752VC’s analyzer gives me that outside perspective before I ever step into a real pitch meeting

What needs improvement

The UI/UX is generic

vs Alternatives

Pitch

Premast

Chronicle

I chose 1752VC’s Pitch Deck Analyzer because it gives investor-grade feedback, not just design polish. Tools like Pitch and Chronicle are great for building slides, but they don’t tell you if the story or numbers actually hold up in front of a VC. Having a tool built by an actual early-stage VC firm gave me a level of confidence the design-first tools couldn’t.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

84 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

Fundraising has been one of the toughest part of my journey, spent weeks editing my pitch deck, asking friends and family for feedback and getting ghosted from investors. Afterwards, I got informed about 1752vc pitch deck analyzer and gave it a shot. I thought it was about to be some generic AI report but it wasn't, it highlighted where I was losing investor confidence, where my assumptions weren't convincing enough, and where the narrative between slides broke down. For the first time, I felt like I was seeing my startup through the eyes of an investor rather than my own. It does make sense because it's mentioned on the website that it was trained on 25,000 real pitch decks and built from an actual VC perspective. I also liked that the feedback was specific enough that I could actually act on it.

What needs improvement

It takes time to get the results but still worth it.

vs Alternatives

I didn't see a competitor in that space. I tried using chatgpt and claude, but it just gave me generic advice. With the pitch deck analyzer the feedback felt more of how an investor would actually think when reading my deck, and I also wanted feedback that focused on fundraising rather than making my slides look better.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

105 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

Pro

Clearly categorize different priorities of problems spotted (most impactful to trivial). I find this super helpful because it can spot 10-20 problems for 1 deck, and it's hella tiring to go through them one by one, but still uncertain which one to target first.

Con

It takes 10-20 minutes to review one deck, which is a little bit slower than my expectation. However, I am not sure whether this is the software's problem or because I'm using vpn.

vs Alternatives

It offers genuine and sharps insights from an actual vc perspective.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

120 views4mo ago

•4 reviews

What's great

love the clear analysis, its obvious the knowledge base has lots of true investor in it not just a LLM training data but actual deals being used as training ground! It keeps track of your deck progress which is helpful as well.

What needs improvement

I do wish it would accept weblinks as source like brieflink.com not just a file upload. valuable tool regardless!

vs Alternatives

OpenVC AI Deck Reviews

Slidebean.pitch-deck-reviewer

slidebean is nice and the community is helpful. thye product is not as thought though and is missing VC data to match against the way 1752 does. OpenVC seems less polished backend, the notes are more generic.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

59 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

Honestly it grilled (and humbled) me but the great part about this tool is that it challenged a lot of projections and market sizing assumptions that I hadn't really stress-tested yet. What's more, it didn't just say "this is weak," it told me exactly what would make each one defensible.

That speaks to what I think the real strength of this tool is: it can easily spot and prioritize 20 problems (or maybe that's just in my case) in one deck with what I presume an actual investor would say if they were taking a first pass at it. Super helpful stuff.

What needs improvement

Took a while I'm not gonna lie to get me feedback, but totally worth it.

vs Alternatives

Would've used Claude if not for this - haven't come across any other competitors

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

34 views3mo ago