Viktor.comAn AI coworker that actually does the work
Promoted
Breachrr
Know the moment your team's credentials leak
8 followers
Know the moment your team's credentials leak
8 followers
The average business finds out about a breach 194 days after it happens. Breachrr closes that gap. We monitor breach databases, infostealer logs, paste sites, public code, and lookalike domains, and alert you the moment your team is exposed. Built for SMBs, MSPs, and startups.
@mdporsch How do you stop the alerts becoming background noise? A team that gets used to breach warnings stops reading them.
@peterdigitalis Three things Breachrr does differently. First, alerts are severity-scored, so a fresh credential from a recent infostealer log lands as high priority and a ten year old leak of a password that's since been rotated doesn't. You're not reading every alert with the same weight because they don't arrive with the same weight. Second, the dashboard shows posture over time, not just individual alerts, so the read isn't another warning today but here's what's changed since last week and what still needs your attention. Third, there's a proper resolution workflow. Once you've acted on an alert, it stops nagging you. The tools that turn into background noise are the ones that treat every ping as equal and never let you close the loop.
@mdporsch The resolution workflow is the part most tools skip, and I think it matters more than the severity scoring does.
Severity fixes loudness. Habituation runs on consequence. I work on consumer fraud and the clearest case is the bank transfer warning: correct every time, ignored anyway, because being right has never once cost the reader anything.
If closing an alert also showed what followed, the credential surfaced again or it never did, resolution would be teaching rather than clearing a queue.
@peterdigitalis You're right that severity handles loudness, and consequence is what breaks habituation. The bank transfer warning is the exact analogy, and browser certificate warnings suffer the same problem for the same reason. Being technically correct has no cost to the reader, so they route around it.
The "what followed" loop isn't in Breachrr today. It's a proper gap. Adding it opens some design questions, but nothing unworkable. The harder part is presenting the follow-up in a way that actually teaches rather than adding another notification to skim.
Would be interested to hear how you'd approach it. Consumer fraud alerting is the closest cousin to this problem, and I've mostly been reasoning about it from the security side.