Launching today
ClawSecure
The only complete security platform for OpenClaw AI agents
289 followers
The only complete security platform for OpenClaw AI agents
289 followers
ClawSecure is CrowdStrike for OpenClaw AI agents. 3-layer security audit, real-time Watchtower monitoring, agent marketplace and identity security, and full 10/10 OWASP ASI coverage. 41% of top skills are dangerous. 1 in 5 are sending your data to attackers. Secure your agents in 30 seconds for free. clawsecure.ai
ClawSecure
@vouchy Great question. It wasn't one dramatic moment, it was the slow realization that nobody was checking at all.
I spent over a decade in Web3 and DeFi watching what happens when ecosystems scale without security infrastructure. Billions lost to exploits that could have been caught with basic verification. When I started digging into OpenClaw, I expected to find some gaps. What I didn't expect was the scale. 41% of the most popular skills with vulnerabilities. 1 in 5 carrying active malware indicators. 99.3% declaring zero permissions. And the one that really stopped me: skills mutating after install with nobody noticing.
That's when it shifted from "someone should build this" to "I have to build this." I'd already lived through what happens when you don't. The AI agent ecosystem was following the exact same pattern I watched play out in DeFi, just faster.
The data told the story. We just made sure everyone could finally see it.
Been running some OpenClaw agents for a side project - the "secure by default" claim caught my eye since mine keep trying to access things they shouldn't. Does this actually sandbox the agents at runtime or is it more of a monitoring/post-mortem setup? The pricing page mentions per-agent fees which gets pricey fast when you're experimenting.
ClawSecure
@lliora Great question and want to make sure I clear up a couple things.
ClawSecure isn't a runtime sandbox. We secure the source, not the execution environment. Our approach is: verify the skill before it ever runs on your machine, then continuously monitor it for changes after install. The 3-layer audit catches prompt injection, credential exfiltration, shell execution patterns, and supply chain vulnerabilities. Watchtower then watches for code mutations in real time. The thesis is that in OpenClaw, the code IS the attack, so making sure the code is safe before it executes is the right layer to solve this at.
For agents that keep trying to access things they shouldn't, scanning the skills you're running would tell you immediately whether that behavior is baked into the code or coming from somewhere else. That's a 30-second answer.
Also want to clarify: ClawSecure is completely free. No pricing page, no per-agent fees. Scan as many skills as you want, no signup, no paywall, no limits. You might be thinking of a different tool. Go experiment to your heart's content at clawsecure.ai.
ClawSecure
@manhdakhac Thank you! And you don't need to be technical to use ClawSecure. That was a core design decision. Paste any skill URL, hit scan, and the Security Audit Report breaks everything down in plain language with severity ratings so you can instantly see whether a skill is safe or not.
For learning more about OpenClaw security in general, our blog at clawsecure.ai/blog covers topics ranging from beginner-friendly overviews to deep technical dives. Articles like "Is OpenClaw Safe?" and our OWASP ASI explainers are great starting points if you're new to the space.
As for what's next: we're expanding skill coverage across the ecosystem, building out notification integrations for Watchtower alerts, and working toward supporting additional open-source agent frameworks beyond OpenClaw. Lots more coming.
Appreciate you being here on launch day, and don't hesitate to ask if you have questions as you explore!
This is addressing a massive blind spot in the AI agent ecosystem. The stat about 22.9% of skills changing their code after install is genuinely alarming. Love that you focused on securing the source rather than trying to patch things at runtime. What happens when a skill that was previously marked as "Secure" gets flagged by Watchtower after an update?
ClawSecure
@mcarmonas That's the exact scenario Watchtower was built for. Here's what happens:
Watchtower continuously monitors every tracked skill via SHA-256 hash comparison. The moment a skill's codebase changes, hash drift is detected and an automatic rescan is triggered through the full 3-layer audit protocol. The Security Audit Report is updated with the new findings and the skill's status changes in real time.
So a skill that was Secure at 9 AM could be flagged Concerning or Critical by noon if the developer pushed a malicious update. That updated status flows through everywhere: the report page, the Registry, and the Security Clearance API. Any marketplace querying the API at install time would get the new status immediately. Secure becomes Denied the moment the threat is confirmed.
This is why the 22.9% stat matters so much. Those aren't hypothetical risks. Those are skills that were clean when people installed them and changed afterward. Without continuous monitoring, you'd never know. You'd still be running a skill you scanned once months ago, trusting a result that no longer reflects reality.
A one-time scan is a snapshot. Watchtower makes it a living security layer.
Appreciate the thoughtful question and glad the source-first approach resonates!
FuseBase
Congrats @jdsalbego @fiatretired
Are you mapping agent behavior dynamically or just scanning the skill code?
ClawSecure
@kate_ramakaieva Thanks!
We scan the skill code across three independent layers and then continuously monitor it for changes. That's a deliberate architectural choice, not a gap.
In the OpenClaw ecosystem, the code IS the attack. Skills ship with full system access, no sandbox, no permissions model. When a skill contains C2 callback beaconing, credential exfiltration endpoints, or shell execution patterns, that's not a runtime anomaly. That's the code doing exactly what it was written to do.
So we secure the source rather than chase symptoms at execution. Layer 1 (55+ OpenClaw-specific patterns) catches threats that are structurally invisible to generic scanners because they don't understand the skill format. Layers 2 and 3 handle static/behavioral analysis and supply chain CVEs.
Where we go beyond static scanning is Watchtower. Skills mutate after install. 22.9% of the ecosystem already has. Watchtower detects hash drift in real time, triggers automatic rescans through the full 3-layer protocol, and updates the Security Audit Report. Continuous integrity verification, not just a one-time checkpoint.
The right question isn't "what is the agent doing right now?" It's "should this code be running at all?" That's what ClawSecure answers.
Really cool idea. Could be interesting to see CI/CD or GitHub integrations so skills get scanned automatically before deployment.
Congrats on the launch!
ClawSecure
@grover___dev Thanks and love this idea. CI/CD integration is a natural extension of what we've already built. The Security Clearance API already returns real-time clearance status programmatically, so plugging that into a GitHub Action or CI pipeline where skills get automatically scanned before merge or deployment is a short step from where we are today.
Imagine: a pull request that modifies a skill triggers a ClawSecure scan, and the build fails if it comes back Critical. Or a deployment pipeline that checks Security Clearance status before pushing to production. That's exactly the kind of "shift left" security workflow we want to enable.
GitHub integration specifically is on our roadmap. The infrastructure is there, it's really about building the developer experience around it. If that's something you'd use, I'd love to know your setup. GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, something else? Helps us prioritize the right integration first.
Appreciate the feedback and the support on launch day!
@jdsalbego That makes a lot of sense. GitHub Actions would probably be the easiest starting point for most teams.
Congrats on the launch, @jdsalbego! The real-time Watchtower monitoring is cool. I like how it keeps checking skills all the time. Makes me feel safer using OpenClaw agents.
ClawSecure
@taimur_haider1 That's exactly the feeling we're building for. Watchtower exists because a one-time scan gives you a snapshot, not protection. When 22.9% of skills change their code after install, you need something watching continuously. Glad it's already giving you that confidence. That's the whole point.
Thanks for the support on launch day!