Hey Product Hunt! I've been working in software teams for over a 15 years and the same pattern kept showing up everywhere — the same 2-3 senior developers doing almost all the PR reviews while everyone else stayed quiet. PRs would sit unreviewed for days, blocking releases and burning out the people who actually cared. The frustrating part is it's not that people are lazy. It's that reviewing PRs has no visibility, no recognition, and no incentive. You write code and people see it. You review someone else's code and nobody notices. So I built CodeChamp. It scores your team based on PRs reviewed, lines of code touched, and inline comments left. It awards badges for good review habits and posts a weekly Slack digest every Monday naming the top reviewer. The whole thing runs on your existing GitHub setup — no bots, no new workflows, up and running in under two minutes. A few things I'd love feedback on from the PH community: Does the scoring system feel fair to your team? Which badges resonate most? What would make you actually show this to your engineering manager? Happy to answer any questions — and if you've dealt with the same PR review bottleneck I'd love to hear how your team handled it.

Forum Threads

p/codechamp

•

5mo ago

CodeChamp, gamified PR reviews

Hi!

I'm Slobodan, founder of CodeChamp.

In every dev team I've worked in, PR reviews were always bottlenecked on the same handful of people. PRs sat unreviewed for days, blocking releases and burning out the people who actually cared.

Existing tools were either too heavy or too passive. So I built CodeChamp - it gamifies PR reviews with scores, badges, and a weekly Slack digest naming the top reviewer every Monday.

View all

CodeChamp

Turn code reviews into a team sport

Turn code reviews into a team sport

Forum Threads

CodeChamp, gamified PR reviews

Forum Threads

CodeChamp, gamified PR reviews