Context.dev

Name: Context.dev
Rating: 4.93 (15 reviews)

One API to scrape, enrich, and understand the web.

4.9•15 reviews•

2.1K followers

One API to scrape, enrich, and understand the web.

4.9•15 reviews•

2.1K followers

Visit website

Context.dev gives your AI agents and apps real-time access to structured web data, no brittle scraping infrastructure needed. Scrape any URL as clean markdown or HTML, extract brand data (logos, colors, fonts, socials) from any domain, crawl sitemaps, resolve transaction descriptors, and more. Typed SDKs for TypeScript, Python, and Ruby. Trusted by 5,000+ businesses including Mintlify, Daily.dev, Ferndesk.com, and more. Most teams integrate in under 10 minutes.

LenzIndependent, multi-model fact-checking API for AI workflows

Promoted

Context.dev Launches

Context.devOne API to scrape, enrich, and extract the internet

Launched on July 2nd, 2026

Context.devOne API to scrape, enrich, and understand the web.

Launched on March 22nd, 2026

4.9

Based on 15 reviews

Review Context.dev?

Reviewers say Context.dev is a practical web-fetch and enrichment layer for AI agents: fast to integrate, reliable in use, and notably good at returning clean, structured, model-ready output instead of raw HTML. Users and founders of products like Migma AI and Notra praise its speed, support, and brand-data extraction, with some saying it replaces a scraper, proxy, and cleanup stack. Critiques are limited but specific: docs could use more examples, brand color detection needs polish, and compliance visibility around site-policy changes is unclear.

+12

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Dial

•82 reviews

What's great

Been using it as the web-fetch layer for a coding agent setup instead of maintaining my own scraper/proxy stack. The markdown-cleanup output is genuinely good for feeding pages into an LLM without a bunch of nav/footer junk eating tokens, and the brand/company enrichment endpoints saved me from writing a bunch of one-off logo/favicon scraping code. Typed SDK meant it was a 10 minute integration like they claim, not a "10 minutes then 2 hours of debugging" situation.

What needs improvement

Would like clearer visibility into what happens when a target site changes its robots.txt or ToS after I've already built a pipeline on it - right now it's not obvious whether that fails loudly on my end or just quietly keeps pulling until something downstream looks wrong. A status/changelog per-domain would help a lot for compliance peace of mind.

vs Alternatives

Looked at rolling my own with Playwright plus a paid proxy pool, and at a couple of the generic scraping APIs that just hand back raw HTML. Didn't want to own the anti-bot cat and mouse game myself, and the raw-HTML tools still left me writing the markdown cleanup and enrichment logic on top.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

771 views2mo ago

used Context.dev to build Notra

instead of Firecrawl

•15 reviews

What's great

I have been super happy with Context.dev its not a perfect product by all means but the top tier support and usually 1-2day turnaround time on requests is pushing it close to being perfect!

What needs improvement

For me right now its mostly brand color extraction being a bit more polished and better at detecting whats primary and what is an accent color.

vs Alternatives

Firecrawl

I never liked the concurrent browser limit of Firecrawl but thought this was just the industry standard until I used Context.dev which does not enforce such a limit. Especially in AI apps where you have lots of concurrency thats a no brainer.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

873 views2mo ago

used Context.dev to build Migma AI

•10 reviews

What's great

We’ve been using Context.dev’s APIs for almost half a year, and the experience has been excellent. It’s easy to use, very fast, and consistently reliable, which is exactly what we care about most.

What needs improvement

Overall, it’s a fantastic product and I’d highly recommend it. The only improvement I’d love to see is even more features and examples in the docs as the product grows.

vs Alternatives

We chose Context.dev because the quality of the results and speed were better for our use case compared to other options we considered.

Report

518 views2mo ago

Dial

•82 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

771 views2mo ago

used Context.dev to build Notra

instead of Firecrawl

•15 reviews

What's great

I have been super happy with Context.dev its not a perfect product by all means but the top tier support and usually 1-2day turnaround time on requests is pushing it close to being perfect!

What needs improvement

For me right now its mostly brand color extraction being a bit more polished and better at detecting whats primary and what is an accent color.

vs Alternatives

Firecrawl

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

873 views2mo ago

used Context.dev to build Migma AI

•10 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

Overall, it’s a fantastic product and I’d highly recommend it. The only improvement I’d love to see is even more features and examples in the docs as the product grows.

vs Alternatives

We chose Context.dev because the quality of the results and speed were better for our use case compared to other options we considered.

Report

518 views2mo ago