Composer 2 by Cursor is a frontier-level coding model built for complex, long-horizon development tasks. It combines strong benchmark performance with highly efficient pricing ($0.50/M input, $2.50/M output). Powered by continued pretraining and reinforcement learning, it delivers smarter code generation with better cost-performance, plus a faster variant for real-time workflows.
I love @Cursor. It's enabled me to build (vibe code) so many web apps, sites, extensions, and little things quickly that 1. bring me joy and 2. help me with work or realize personal projects. However... I'm seeing a TON of movement around @Claude by Anthropic's Claude Code. I haven't personally tried it but it's apparently insane (and can also be expensive?) I'm curious. Should I switch? What are you currently using? Or do they both have their own use case. I right now like cursor because I can build directly in a GitHub repo or locally and it helps me learn my way around an IDE. Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts!
Last month, Cursor launched for the fifth time on Product Hunt in 2025.
The 2024 Product of the Year [1] still hits the charts. They have launched web and mobile agents, a visual editor, and 2.0, consistently ranking in the Top 5 Products of the Day.
Framer — Launch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.
Launch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.
Promoted
How do benchmark gains translate to messy, real codebases with legacy patterns, unclear requirements, or incomplete context?
Report
Curious where people are already feeling the difference most, bigger codebase work, speed in normal iteration, or just lower cost for heavy usage.
Report
It has become very expensive. When you first launched, you were the first and the best—you had no competition. But now there are many IDEs on the market, and they’re significantly cheaper than you and perform just as well. You need to adjust your pricing strategy; otherwise, your market share will shrink considerably.
Report
The pricing on this is honestly insane. I've been using Cursor daily for the past few months and my biggest complaint was burning through tokens on longer refactors. If Composer 2 actually holds up on multi-file edits at that price point, it's a no-brainer. Updating now.
Just gave it a spin. Loving the speed and the cost efficiency, even if it still needs a lot of hand-holding. That's great for planning though, and to carry out simple tasks :) It will totally become my daily driver
Report
That's fascinating. Cursor isn't just an app or AI model company; it's both. I think this dual identity is the biggest differentiator Cursor has among hundreds of coding agents and editors.
Reviewers broadly see Cursor as a highly effective daily coding tool that fits naturally into existing workflows, especially for multi-file edits, debugging, refactoring, and understanding a full codebase with little context switching. The maker of
credit it with faster prototyping and maintenance. Common complaints center on unstable or unclear pricing, occasional freezes or crashes, and AI output that can be verbose, inconsistent, or still needs careful review.
The best coding agent for a while. it is expensive though. you pay a premium price for a premium agent.
What needs improvement
subscription cost (4)
pricing is an issue, especially because that different plans that everybody has. there is not enough clarity about pricing. one can spend 2 requests (same for any other model) for an opus 4.6 request, while other can spend 7 dollars
Cursor is just better at using the given model up to its limits. None of the other agentic products success that much. Also plan mode is a beast if you give some time to your task and plan everything carefully. While coding with the popular tech stacks, Cursor executes the plan flawlessly most of the time.
In spite of the pricing strategy issues, it became my de-facto daily driver. I'm so used to Cursor harness I'm struggling to even use its competitors well enough to make comparisons! :D Great job!
What needs improvement
Ever since cursor launch, I still get occasional freezes where I'm forced to reboot the app to make it work
vs Alternatives
I find so much more useful to see what is happening while cursor is answering. That, combined with the extremely good harness, made it quite tough to beat
"As a solo founder managing 8+ SaaS projects, Cursor is my unfair advantage. I chose it for:
AI Native Workflow: It’s not just an editor with a plugin; it’s built around the AI, which makes refactoring complex BI logic in MetricMap 10x faster.
Codebase Context: The way it understands the entire project structure helps me maintain consistency across my full-stack architecture.
Rapid Prototyping: It allowed me to move from idea to a working analytics dashboard in record time, handling the boilerplate so I could focus on the unique features.
How do benchmark gains translate to messy, real codebases with legacy patterns, unclear requirements, or incomplete context?
Curious where people are already feeling the difference most, bigger codebase work, speed in normal iteration, or just lower cost for heavy usage.
It has become very expensive. When you first launched, you were the first and the best—you had no competition. But now there are many IDEs on the market, and they’re significantly cheaper than you and perform just as well. You need to adjust your pricing strategy; otherwise, your market share will shrink considerably.
The pricing on this is honestly insane. I've been using Cursor daily for the past few months and my biggest complaint was burning through tokens on longer refactors. If Composer 2 actually holds up on multi-file edits at that price point, it's a no-brainer. Updating now.
Bench for Claude Code
Just gave it a spin. Loving the speed and the cost efficiency, even if it still needs a lot of hand-holding. That's great for planning though, and to carry out simple tasks :) It will totally become my daily driver
That's fascinating. Cursor isn't just an app or AI model company; it's both. I think this dual identity is the biggest differentiator Cursor has among hundreds of coding agents and editors.
People say it's Kimi