We kept seeing teams jump straight to citation tactics without checking the first constraint: can AI crawlers reach the pages they want cited?
We added Agent Analytics to FixAEO to show which bots GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Googlebot, and others visit, which pages they read, and how often.
I m curious how other makers verify this today. Do you trust server logs, Search Console, a crawler tool, or mostly robots.txt checks? What signal would make you confident an AI engine is actually discovering the right pages?
Hey hunters 👋 Nitish here, solo maker of FixAEO.
Search is splitting in two. Half the people I know now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini before they buy — but you have no idea whether those answers recommend you or your competitor. The tools that measure it either just hand you a score, or are enterprise-priced.
FixAEO does the part that moves the needle — it fixes:
1. Paste a URL → we scan 8 AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity + more) in under 3 min
2. You get a 0–100 score + the exact reasons you're not being cited
3. We generate the fixes — schema, llms.txt, robots.txt, citation-ready copy — paste in and re-scan
There's a free tier + 19 free tools (no signup) if you just want to see where you stand.
I built this solo — I'd love your honest feedback: what's confusing, what's missing, which AI engines matter most to you. Here all day. 🙏