FullEnrich

Name: FullEnrich
Rating: 4.73 (32 reviews)

Waterfall Enrichment Email & Phone - All vendors, one place

4.7•32 reviews•

2.3K followers

Waterfall Enrichment Email & Phone - All vendors, one place

4.7•32 reviews•

2.3K followers

Visit website

Sales enablement

FullEnrich aggregates data from over 15 vendors for B2B contact enrichment. Using waterfall enrichment, it provides the best enrichment rates for emails and mobile phone numbers, helping you reach your future customers / candidates.

ClarifyThe autonomous CRM that helps you sell more

Promoted

FullEnrich Launches

FullEnrich 2.0Waterfall enrichment for emails & phone numbers

Launched on October 3rd, 2024

FullEnrichWaterfall enrichment email & phone, all vendors, one place

Launched on January 9th, 2024

4.7

Based on 32 reviews

Review FullEnrich?

Reviewers largely praise FullEnrich for being easy to use and fast, especially for outreach teams pulling lists from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator. The most consistent theme is better contact coverage and solid data accuracy from checking multiple providers, which users say saves time, reduces admin work, and can lower bounce rates. One founder reviewer says the waterfall setup and pay-only-when-data-is-found model make testing worthwhile, though they want clearer source-level reporting and would use it alongside Apollo or Clay. The main negative note is a serious privacy complaint about unauthorized personal data use.

+30

Summarized with AI

Pros

high enrichment rates (7)

data accuracy (5)

multiple data sources (5)

streamlined data enrichment (5)

easy to use (3)

one contract multiple sources (3)

fast performance (2)

LinkedIn integration (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•24 reviews

What's great

multiple data sources (5)data accuracy (5)high enrichment rates (7)

For us, the strongest part of FullEnrich is the waterfall approach.

Relying on one database is usually hit or miss. Checking multiple providers for the same contact gives us a better chance of actually finding a usable email or phone number.

On the lists we tested, the email data also looked better than what we usually get from Apollo or Clay. We wouldn’t replace either based on one test, but the difference was enough for us to want to try FullEnrich on a real campaign.

We also like that credits are charged when data is actually found. That makes testing different lists easier to justify.

What needs improvement

We’d like a little more visibility into which sources are producing the best results for our lists.

When several providers sit behind one waterfall, knowing where the strongest coverage is coming from would help us decide how much of the enrichment workflow we should move over.

vs Alternatives

Apollo.io

Clay

Apollo and Clay are the obvious comparisons for us.

Apollo is convenient for building lists, and Clay gives us more flexibility when the workflow gets complicated. FullEnrich seems more focused on one thing: getting better contact data from the list you already have.

I can see us using it alongside those tools first rather than replacing anything immediately.

Report

7 views21d ago

•1 review

I’ve just discovered that Fullenrich is using and possibly selling my phone number, even though I never gave any consent and never shared my data with them. This kind of data exploitation is illegal under EU regulations (GDPR). In France, where I’m based, selling or using personal data without explicit user consent is a serious breach of the law. Where is this data coming from? What verification mechanisms does Fullenrich have in place to ensure that the data they resell is legally obtained? If you care about user privacy, this practice should raise big red flags.

What needs improvement

user privacy concerns (1)data exploitation (1)

Report

73 views1yr ago

•47 reviews

Great SaaS app for building your cold outreach campaigns and not only. I have used challenging prospects of whom I already know the phone numbers and obviosuly emails, and the results were accurate. Jolly good: after all that's the core of the service, wight? Yes, but other services I use couldn't retrieve them, including Linkedin Sales Navigator. On top of that, what really stands out for me is: - unused credits are rolled over for 3 months - GDPR compliant - credits are used only on successful queries This denotes professional reliability and infuses trust and confidence. The latter, in particular, is huge compared to the competition.

What's great

GDPR compliant (1)data accuracy (5)cold outreach support (1)rollover credits (1)

Report

70 views2yr ago

•24 reviews

What's great

multiple data sources (5)data accuracy (5)high enrichment rates (7)

For us, the strongest part of FullEnrich is the waterfall approach.

Relying on one database is usually hit or miss. Checking multiple providers for the same contact gives us a better chance of actually finding a usable email or phone number.

We also like that credits are charged when data is actually found. That makes testing different lists easier to justify.

What needs improvement

We’d like a little more visibility into which sources are producing the best results for our lists.

When several providers sit behind one waterfall, knowing where the strongest coverage is coming from would help us decide how much of the enrichment workflow we should move over.