Gemini

Google's answer to GPT-4

4.9•137 reviews•

5.5K followers

Google's answer to GPT-4

4.9•137 reviews•

5.5K followers

•

•

•

AI Infrastructure Tools

Google's largest and most capable AI model. Built from the ground up to be multimodal, Gemini can generalize and seamlessly understand, operate across and combine different types of information, including text, images, audio, video and code.

Gemini Reviews

The community submitted 137 reviews to tell us what they like about Gemini, what Gemini can do better, and more.

4.9

Based on 137 reviews

Review Gemini?

Gemini earns praise for speed, clean UX, and everyday utility across writing, research, coding help, and image generation. Makers of

Google

highlight reliability and tight Workspace fit, while makers of

Warp

note strengths in multimodal understanding and rapid iteration for agent workflows. Makers of

Greta

credit it with coding/reasoning support for full‑stack app building. Users like multilingual handling and structured outputs, but cite inconsistencies, occasional hallucinations, and prompts leaking into answers. Consensus: a versatile, cost‑effective option, especially strong for multimodal tasks, document extraction, and teams in Google’s ecosystem.

+137

Summarized with AI

Pros

fast performance (14)

high-quality outputs (8)

multimodal capabilities (8)

large context window (7)

Google integration (5)

cost-effective (4)

affordable (3)

AI Studio (2)

free tier (2)

real-time AI responses (2)

Cons

hallucinations (4)

inconsistent data (4)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•9 reviews

This inconsistency makes it challenging to rely on the tool for accurate information or practical use. While the concept is promising, the current execution falls short of expectations, particularly in terms of reliability and accuracy. It's crucial for such tools to provide dependable and consistent responses to be effectively utilized in any practical scenario.

What needs improvement

inconsistent data (4)

Report

24 views12mo ago

•9 reviews

Long-term I think that Gemini and Google will have the edge over competitors. The structured output builder in AI Studio in particular is very impressive and 2.5 enables extremely long continuous outputs that are valuable for lots of emerging use-cases.

What's great

structured output builder (1)large context window (7)AI Studio (2)

Report

10 views11mo ago

•19 reviews

I’ve been using Google’s Gemini as my go‑to AI co‑pilot, and it’s a solid step up from prior PaLM models. Its multimodal capabilities mean I can chat, generate images, and even get help with code all in one place—no juggling between tools. The Ultra tier shines on complex reasoning and creativity, while the smaller Nano model is surprisingly capable offline. Integration with Google Workspace keeps workflows smooth, but you’ll notice the occasional hallucination and a dependence on Google’s ecosystem. If you want a versatile, all‑in‑one AI—especially for multimodal tasks—Gemini is well worth a look.

What's great

multimodal capabilities (8)seamless Google Workspace integration (1)

What needs improvement

hallucinations (4)

Report

83 views11mo ago

•6 reviews

Congrats on the launch! I've been waiting for a truly mobile-native, conversational AI and this delivers. I just used it to brainstorm and outline a blog post while walking my dog – something that's always been clunky with text-based interfaces on mobile. The low latency on the voice recognition is key to making this feel like a real conversation. A quick thought: It would be a game-changer if the chat history could be easily exported or synced with Google Docs/Keep for further editing. Is anything like that on the roadmap? Keep up the amazing work!

What's great

fast performance (14)

Report

260 views9mo ago

•27 reviews

We use this for a chatbot for founder, which we built.

Report

2 views2yr ago

•10 reviews

Gemini is a decent tool I use for mail drafting and other tasks. It’s reliable and gets the job done without any major issues. While it may not be the flashiest, it’s a solid option for everyday use. Worth trying if you need a simple assistant.

Report

1 view9mo ago

•10 reviews

I use Gemini by Google every day to help with writing, researching, and organizing my thoughts. It’s incredibly useful when I’m juggling multiple tasks and need quick support without breaking my flow. Whether I’m drafting emails, exploring complex topics, or just looking for a clear explanation, Gemini delivers fast and accurate results. It’s helped me cut down on time spent switching between apps and digging for information. I feel more productive and focused with it in my workflow. The interface is clean and responsive, which makes using it feel effortless. Overall, it’s a tool I now rely on heavily

What's great

fast performance (14)context aware (1)high-quality outputs (8)

Report

29 views9mo ago

fileAI

•11 reviews

Very easy fine-tuning interface and excellent performance on my specific task.

What's great

high-quality outputs (8)

Report

17 views8mo ago

•4 reviews

Gemini has potential, especially in understanding current Google ecosystem content and multilingual input like Thai. But the output often feels less polished or flexible compared to ChatGPT. Speed is decent, UI is clean, but prompt consistency is hit-or-miss. A good backup, but not my go-to.

What's great

multimodal capabilities (8)Google integration (5)

What needs improvement

inconsistent data (4)

Report

28 views8mo ago

•4 reviews

I recently tried the newly launched Google Bard integrated with Gemini, and unfortunately, my experience has been disappointing. The tool frequently produces hallucinations and inconsistent data, especially when responding to the same queries with different numerical information. This inconsistency makes it challenging to rely on the tool for accurate information or practical use. While the concept is promising, the current execution falls short of expectations, particularly in terms of reliability and accuracy. It's crucial for such tools to provide dependable and consistent responses to be effectively utilized in any practical scenario.

What needs improvement

hallucinations (4)inconsistent data (4)

Report

7 views2yr ago

1 2 3

•••