Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Visit website

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Google Antigravity Reviews

Name: Google Antigravity
Rating: 4.77 (13 reviews)

The community submitted 13 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

4.8

Based on 13 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviewers say Google Antigravity is strongest when it explains its reasoning, helps plan implementations, and supports complex work without constant context switching. Users highlight practical gains on infra, APIs, and architecture, and some say its newer skills make it useful beyond coding, though the multi-agent workflow is not essential for everyone. The main complaints are still rough edges: UI quirks, minor bugs, weaker handling of large multi-file projects, and limited control over answer length. Founders of Socra and PromptURLs also praise its big-feature design and parallel agent workflow.

+10

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (9)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (4)

View all

•1 review

What's great

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

What needs improvement

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

vs Alternatives

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

5 views13d ago

•1 review

What's great

For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.

What needs improvement

Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.

vs Alternatives

I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

71 views2mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Github Copilot

Claude Code

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

85 views4mo ago

•2 reviews

What's great

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

What needs improvement

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

64 views4mo ago

Product Hunt

•3 reviews

What's great

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

What needs improvement

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Claude Code

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

304 views4mo ago

Product Hunt

•3 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Claude Code

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

304 views4mo ago

used Google Antigravity to build Window View instead of Cursor, Claude Code

•2 reviews

Antigravity with Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 helped me build a lot of Window View! Antigravity's good support for image input and Gemini's strong vision capabilities were super useful due to the visualization nature of this project.

Alternatives Considered

Cursor

Claude Code

Report

2 views19d ago