Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•13 reviews•

1K followers

Visit website

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Google Antigravity Reviews

The community submitted 13 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

4.8

Based on 13 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviewers broadly see Google Antigravity as a strong productivity tool that explains its reasoning well, helps with planning and walkthroughs, and feels especially useful for complex coding work like infra and APIs. Several say it is more practical than Copilot or Cursor for understanding why things happen, not just generating code. Makers of

Socra

and

PromptURLs

also praise it for big-feature design and parallel agent workflows. The main complaints are UI bugs, weak onboarding, limits or weaker fallback models, and uneven handling of larger multi-file projects.

+10

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

used

Google Antigravity

to build Fig Prompt instead of Google AI Studio

•4 reviews

The Gemini integration makes it very easy to get going, has the benefit of VS code extensions too.

Alternatives Considered

Google AI Studio

Report

7d ago

Product Hunt

•3 reviews

What's great

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

What needs improvement

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Claude Code

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

300 views4mo ago

Product Hunt

•3 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Claude Code

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Report

300 views4mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Github Copilot

Claude Code

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

85 views3mo ago

used

Google Antigravity

to build Launch Shots

•3 reviews

Google Antigravity deserves a massive shoutout. I’ve been an AI-accelerated developer since GitHub Copilot launched, but this… this feels like another level. It just gets what I’m trying to build. The speed, the quality, the intuition — I genuinely haven’t had a better experience anywhere else. Without Antigravity, LaunchShots wouldn’t have shipped this fast.

Report

31 views3mo ago

used

Google Antigravity

to build CalPal

•5 reviews

Accelerated my build speed significantly. It allowed me to run and monitor multiple coding agents in parallel to handle the React components and parsing logic simultaneously.

Report

11 views3mo ago

used

Google Antigravity

to build Guessly

•2 reviews

Been using Cursor in the past but recently switched to Antigravity and I am quite amazed.

Report

4 views3mo ago

•1 review

What's great

For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.

What needs improvement

Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.

vs Alternatives

I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

68 views2mo ago