The community submitted 11 reviews to tell
us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and
more.
4.8
Based on 11 reviews
Review Google Antigravity?
Reviews praise Google Antigravity for accelerating real work, with users highlighting autonomous skills that manage email, calendars, and project setup, plus clear implementation plans and walkthroughs. Minor knocks include early-stage UI quirks, brief trial limits, and occasional fallback to weaker models; polish and agent management could improve. From the makers of
, feedback emphasizes strong multi-agent orchestration and big-feature execution, especially when paired with top models and vision inputs. Many compare it favorably to Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot.
Antigravity with Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 helped me build a lot of Window View! Antigravity's good support for image input and Gemini's strong vision capabilities were super useful due to the visualization nature of this project.
Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.
What needs improvement
Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.
Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.